2017
DOI: 10.3233/prm-170463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: Past, present, and future

Abstract: “The National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: Past, Present, and Future” was presented at the Spina Bifida World Congress, March 17, 2017, San Diego, California. This commentary provides a summary of registry activities including the reason for development, a description of the clinic participants and their patients who are participating, analytic works and publications. Two specific efforts that are related to the work of the registry, a urologic protocol to preserve renal function for newborns and young child… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, general information was identified across all of the articles to describe an overview of the NSBPR. The spectrum of articles was representative of individuals of all ages—newborns to 89 years of age (Thibadeau, ). Individuals were eligible to be included in the registry initially if they had one of four SB types: MMC, meningocele, lipomyelomeningocele, or fatty filum (Thibadeau et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, general information was identified across all of the articles to describe an overview of the NSBPR. The spectrum of articles was representative of individuals of all ages—newborns to 89 years of age (Thibadeau, ). Individuals were eligible to be included in the registry initially if they had one of four SB types: MMC, meningocele, lipomyelomeningocele, or fatty filum (Thibadeau et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals were eligible to be included in the registry initially if they had one of four SB types: MMC, meningocele, lipomyelomeningocele, or fatty filum (Thibadeau et al, ). This eligibility was later expanded to include split cord malformation and terminal myelocystocele (Thibadeau, ). In many of the articles, the diagnoses were often grouped into two subtypes: MMC and non‐MMC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations