2003
DOI: 10.1080/01426390306536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Native Plant Enthusiasm: Ecological panacea or xenophobia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So the emission tip radius (R) of our sample would be of the order of few nanometers (considering the sharp emission tip diameter are almost 10% of the particle size) and assuming the height of the post (L) is equal to the film thickness, the approximate b-value obtained for our sample was around 220. This value of b falls within the range (150-300) predicted by Gro¨ning et al [52], for their N-doped DLC films and they stated that this type of b-values were not unusual even on mirror-like polished copper samples. So the local work function comes out $0.15 eV.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…So the emission tip radius (R) of our sample would be of the order of few nanometers (considering the sharp emission tip diameter are almost 10% of the particle size) and assuming the height of the post (L) is equal to the film thickness, the approximate b-value obtained for our sample was around 220. This value of b falls within the range (150-300) predicted by Gro¨ning et al [52], for their N-doped DLC films and they stated that this type of b-values were not unusual even on mirror-like polished copper samples. So the local work function comes out $0.15 eV.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Perhaps the most common and general criticism is that invasion biologists often undermine their scientific and moral credibility through the outward use emotive and/or militaristic terms (e.g., ''alien invaders,'' ''noxious species,'' ''biological pollution,'' ''war against invaders'') to describe INS and explain rationales for control programs (e.g., Jordan 1994;Gobster 2005;Larson 2005). More provocative commentators argue that such a vocabulary is not just scientifically suspect, but that it also reveals deep parallels between the tenets of invasion biology and xenophobia, nationalism, and even Nazism (e.g., Groning and Wolschke-Bulmahn 2003;Theodoropolous 2003). Theodoropolous (2003), one of the most outspoken and controversial critics of INS control, goes so far as to suggest that such language exposes invasion biology as a propaganda-based ''pseudoscience'' that cynically uses fear-mongering about nonnative species for the purpose of attracting funds to university programs, regulatory agencies, and pesticide manufacturers.…”
Section: Invasion Biology and Its Discontentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consider the spread of North American lawn turf grasses, almost all of which are exotic and many of which are aggressive (Robbins and Sharp 2003). As most of the contributors to this issue emphasize, echoing assertions in environmental history and the biosciences, this interpretation and assignment of meaning is value laden (Groning and Wolschke-Bulmahn 2003).…”
Section: Defining the Invasivementioning
confidence: 99%