2010
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The natural abundance of 15N in plant and soil‐available N indicates a shift of main plant N resources to NO from NH along the N leaching gradient

Abstract: To investigate which of ammonium (NH(4)(+)) or nitrate (NO(3)(-)) is used by plants at gradient sites with different nitrogen (N) availability, we measured the natural abundance of (15)N in foliage and soil extractable N. Hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endlicher) planted broadly in Japan was selected for use in this study. We estimated the source proportion of foliar N (NH(4)(+) vs. NO(3)(-)) quantitatively using mass balance equations. The results showed that C. obtusa used mainly NH(4)(+) in N-limited … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(97 reference statements)
8
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, there was no strong evidence that preference for ammonium, for instance, was retained irrespective of its relative availability. This finding is in agreement with previous observations that plants track nitrate availability in lower latitude ecosystems (Houlton et al 2007;Wang and Macko 2011;Kahmen et al 2008;Takebayashi et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…As a result, there was no strong evidence that preference for ammonium, for instance, was retained irrespective of its relative availability. This finding is in agreement with previous observations that plants track nitrate availability in lower latitude ecosystems (Houlton et al 2007;Wang and Macko 2011;Kahmen et al 2008;Takebayashi et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…1) suggests that the proportion of root N uptake from forest floor versus mineral soil did not shift across our sites, as suggested to occur elsewhere (Compton et al 2007). Finally, shifts in reliance on different soil N forms may influence foliar d 15 N, particularly as nitrate availability increases in N-rich sites (Takebayashi et al 2010). We found that foliar d 15 N and soil water d 15 NO 3 -converged to similar values at the most N-rich sites (-1%, Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The depletion of EF at 80-90% net nitrification may be influenced by plant preferences for IN forms, while the relatively more enriched EF value at very high % net nitrification may indicate the influences of other N sources that supported soil nitrification such as atmospheric N deposition. Takebayashi et al (2010) reported a shift of primary plant N sources from NH 4 + -N to NO 3 − -N, which was more δ 15 N-depleted, as the relative availability of NO 3 − -N increased, and a subsequent decrease in plant δ 15 N. Plants at our sites might also preferentially use the dominant NO 3 − -N first when % nitrification is very high. However, future studies are needed to distinguish between the influences of N deposition and gaseous NO 2 on plant δ 15 N. Apart from N availability, plant preferences for N forms, and N isotopic discrimination during N uptake, mycorrhizal processes could also influence plant δ 15 N. Evans et al (1996) reported highly enriched foliar δ 15 N compared to roots of tomato with NO 3 − -N uptake, but no intra-plant δ 15 N differences with NH 4 + -N. Kolb and Evans (2003) found increased N isotopic discrimination in barley during N uptake at high N concentrations rather than low concentrations, whether the source was NH 4 + -N or NO 3 − -N. Hobbie et al (2000) also pointed out that plant-mycorrhizal interactions during N cycling, such as the transfer of N from fungi to plants, could be a significant source of foliar δ 15 N variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%