2021
DOI: 10.1159/000517729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Natural History of Trisomy 21: Outcome Data from a Large Tertiary Referral Centre

Abstract: <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to prospectively gather data on pregnancy outcomes of prenatally diagnosed trisomy 21 (T21) in a large tertiary referral centre. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data were gathered prospectively in a large tertiary referral centre over 5 years from 2013 to 2017 inclusively. Baseline demographic and pregnancy outcome data were recorded on an anonymized computerized database. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same article, the miscarriage rate in the control group was 1.23% and the authors concluded that the procedure related risks of miscarriage following amniocentesis and CVS are lower than expected. In a study by O'Connor et al, 11.7% of mothers of a fetus with Down syndrome and who continued their pregnancy had miscarriage and 26.4% had stillbirth [9]. If these types of invasive methods are performed by expert teams, the miscarriage rate is very low and maternal death was not reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same article, the miscarriage rate in the control group was 1.23% and the authors concluded that the procedure related risks of miscarriage following amniocentesis and CVS are lower than expected. In a study by O'Connor et al, 11.7% of mothers of a fetus with Down syndrome and who continued their pregnancy had miscarriage and 26.4% had stillbirth [9]. If these types of invasive methods are performed by expert teams, the miscarriage rate is very low and maternal death was not reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%