1997
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1997.9707180260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature and Implications of Contextual Influences on Transformational Leadership: A Conceptual Examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
231
0
10

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
231
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain leadership styles are more compatible with particular organizational models (Paware & Eastman 1997). Thus transactional leadership is predominantly found in bureaucratic organizations (Burns 1978).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain leadership styles are more compatible with particular organizational models (Paware & Eastman 1997). Thus transactional leadership is predominantly found in bureaucratic organizations (Burns 1978).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the domain of cultural norm often blurs or overlaps with the domains of structural rule and leadership role, reflected in the construct of corporate culture that contains various elements of structure and leadership as basic cultural artefacts (e.g., Hatch, 1993; Schein, 1992; Tsui, Zhang, Wang, Xin, & Wu, 2006). This is especially true for the links between structural modes and cultural forms, including organic and mechanistic modes as well as hierarchy, market, and clan modes (e.g., Ouchi, 1980; Pawar & Eastman, 1997; Shamir & Howell, 1999). Second, the conceptual overlap is reflected in the operational measures (e.g., Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Moorman, Deshpande, & Zaltman, 1993; O'Reilly, Chatman, & Caldwell, 1991).…”
Section: A Holistic Model Of the Context–trust–behaviour Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural rule can best be captured by the central dimensions of organic versus mechanistic structure (Li, 1998; Pawar & Eastman, 1997; Porter & McLaughlin, 2006; Shamir & Howell, 1999). An organic structure is a system that emphasizes the flexibility and adaptability of ‘soft rules’, while a mechanistic structure is one emphasizing the standardization and reliability of ‘hard rules’ (Burns & Stalker, 1966).…”
Section: A Holistic Model Of the Context–trust–behaviour Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations