The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation

Abstract

Fazey, I., Fazey, J. A., Salisbury, J. G., Lindenmayer, D. B., Dovers, S. (2006). The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation. Environmental Conservation, 33, (1), 1-10. Sponsorship: Endowment for Excellence Scholarship from The Australian National University.Understanding the nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation is a necessary step towards understanding if it should be used and how it might be applied with other types of knowledge in an evidence-based approach. This paper describes the nature of experiential and expert knowledge. It then discusses the role of experiential knowledge as a complement to scientific knowledge and explains the interplay between experiential knowledge with conservation research and practice using a simple conceptual model of how individuals learn. There are five main conclusions: (1) because experiential knowledge will always play a role in decision-making, enhancing ability to learn from experiences (including research) will have a significant influence on the effectiveness of conservation outcomes; (2) while experiential knowledge is qualitatively very different from quantitative information, both are important and complementary; (3) some experiential knowledge can be expressed quantitatively, but experiential knowledge can be difficult to isolate as single facts or propositions and qualitative methods will therefore often be required to elicit experiential knowledge; (4) because each person's expertise is unique, when using experiential knowledge the extent of a person's experience and its relevance to a particular problem need to be specified; and (5) as with any form of knowledge, there are limitations to that derived from personal experience. Synthesis and communication of research is therefore essential to help prevent erroneous thinking and, where possible, experiential knowledge should be used in conjunction with other types of information to guide conservation actions.Peer reviewe

Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development

“…Especially in the context of ecosystem services management, multiple forms of local or situated knowledge exist within rural communities. These include traditional knowledge, i.e., intergenerational understanding of ecosystems and beliefs that condition ecosystem services (Berkes, 1993), as well as more recent situated understandings of ecosystem services and associated management practices (Robertson and McGee, 2003) and personal insights derived from individual experience (Fazey et al, 2006). Such local knowledge contrasts with more formalized scientific knowledge on ecosystem services, often generated by external agencies (including extension agencies, rural experts and researchers) and based on hypothesis building and testing.…”

Deliberative democracy and the problem of tacit knowledge

“…Take, for instance, environmental policy. It is often recognized that environmental policy can be greatly informed by the tacit knowledge of on-the-spot managers and local communities, who have a deep understanding of their environment (Fazey et al, 2005(Fazey et al, , 2006a(Fazey et al, , 2006bRaymond et al, 2010). People can acquire a large and detailed understanding of an ecosystem through extended experience, living and interacting with it.…”

The "World System" Of the Paris Agreement: Exploring The Construction, Dissemination, And Implementation of Climate Knowledge Through Redd

“…A., and Fazey, D. M. A. 2005;Fazey et al 2006;Gadgil, Berkes, and Folke 1993;Kempner, Merz, and Bosk 2011;Merritt et al 2009), social scientists have undertheorized or ignored the inherent power dynamics in this knowledge system. This has challenged our ability to perceive the whole.…”