2002
DOI: 10.1086/342753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature and Size of the Optical Continuum Source in QSO 2237+0305

Abstract: From the peak of a gravitational microlensing high-magnification event in the A component of QSO 2237+0305, which was accurately monitored by the GLITP collaboration, we derived new information on the nature and size of the optical V -band and R-band sources in the far quasar. If the microlensing peak is caused by a microcaustic crossing, we firstly obtained that the standard accretion disk is a scenario more reliable/feasible than other usual axially symmetric models. Moreover, the standard scenario fits both… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
95
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
95
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2. It is clear that whereas components A and C show a small but significant variability (see Shalyapin et al 2002 andGoicoechea et al 2003, for the interpretation of the variation in the component A as the peak of a high-magnification event), images B and D remain relative flat, showing no signs of strong microlensing during the monitoring period. As the expected time delays between the images are short (≤1 day, see Schneider et al 1988;Wambsganss & Paczyński 1994), intrinsic fluctuations would show up in all 4 images almost simultaneously.…”
Section: Monitoring Observations Of Q2237+0305mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. It is clear that whereas components A and C show a small but significant variability (see Shalyapin et al 2002 andGoicoechea et al 2003, for the interpretation of the variation in the component A as the peak of a high-magnification event), images B and D remain relative flat, showing no signs of strong microlensing during the monitoring period. As the expected time delays between the images are short (≤1 day, see Schneider et al 1988;Wambsganss & Paczyński 1994), intrinsic fluctuations would show up in all 4 images almost simultaneously.…”
Section: Monitoring Observations Of Q2237+0305mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8), leading to best-fit values of p in the range 2.3−2.4. It is very remarkable that p ∼ 2−3 is close to the power-law index for a standard accretion disk (p = 8/3; e.g., Shalyapin et al 2002). Very recently, Guerras et al (2013) have claimed that a significant part of the UV Fe ii and Fe iii emissions may originate in the accretion disk.…”
Section: Microlensing Factorymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The intensity distribution I(λ, r), r = (x 2 + y 2 ) 1/2 , was then convolved with μ B (x, y) to obtain (e.g., Jaroszyński et al 1992;Shalyapin et al 2002) …”
Section: Microlensing Factorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes possible some estimations of certain GLS characteristics, in particular, the source size [25]. For example, in case of the well-known GLS Q2237+0305 (Einstein Cross), several HAEs was observed [26][27][28] and the estimates of the source size have been obtained within different source models [16,[29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Preliminary Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%