the country (Reinders et al., 2003). Therefore, to address the issue of climate change mitigation via household consumption, it is necessary to expand our focus beyond direct energy use.A major source of indirect energy consumption comes from food consumption. Recent studies indicate that the proportion of energy use dedicated to food production is substantial. For example, estimates of total U.S. energy used to produce food range from 8-16% (Canning, 2010;Cuéllar & Webber, 2010) depending on how the boundaries are drawn around the energy input analysis of the food (i.e., higher estimates include energy used by consumers who drive to buy food; Cuéllar & Webber, 2010). The opportunity for reductions in indirect energy consumption via food has also garnered more attention as empirical research has documented that developed nations waste 13-25% of food brought into the home. Environmental groups such as World Resources Institute and Natural Resources Defense Council have begun to focus on food systems, including consumption, as a realm to target for reducing waste and shifting consumption for greenhouse gas reductions.Households can make significant contributions to climate change mitigation through efficiency and curtailment behaviors for both direct and indirect energy emissions (Gardner & Stern, 2008). Efficiency behaviors are actions or measures that result in less energy being used for a given level of energy service (e.g., insulating a building, installing light-emitting diodes [LEDs]). Direct energy efficiency behaviors typically involve the one-off purchase and installation of an appliance or device, and imply a financial cost (e.g., home retrofits, energy efficient appliances). For indirect efficiency behaviors, such as food consumption, this means choosing food that has been produced using less energy intensive means (i.e., climate friendly agriculture) or switching to foods that provide similar nutritional value (i.e., calories or protein content) with fewer greenhouse gas impacts. Curtailment behaviors are actions that result in less service or utility (e.g., lowering thermostat settings, switching off lights) or buying less food to avoid overeating or food waste. Direct and indirect energy curtailment behaviors tend to be low or no cost but need to be done frequently to achieve energy savings (e.g., lowering thermostat settings, switching off lights, and purchasing smaller portions of food) and can involve the loss of amenity associated (e.g., less heating, less lighting, and less calories). In this overview, we include research on direct household energy (i.e., gas, electricity, and fuel use) for the provision of useful services (e.g., lighting, heating) and conservation efforts to provide insights into how this may apply (or not apply) to addressing indirect energy use, specifically food, in households.Evidence suggests that there is potential for households to reduce direct and indirect domestic energy use. A recent survey of U.S. households indicates that greenhouse gas emissions from household dire...