2021
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of intraspecific and interspecific genome size variation in taxonomically complex eyebrights

Abstract: Background and aims Genome size varies considerably across the diversity of plant life. Although genome size is, by definition, affected by genetic presence/absence variants, which are ubiquitous in population sequencing studies, genome size is often treated as an intrinsic property of a species. Here, we studied intra- and interspecific genome size variation in taxonomically complex British eyebrights (Euphrasia, Orobanchaceae). Our aim is to document genome size diversity and investigate un… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
29
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing about the shortcomings of genome assemblies, which tend to be smaller than genomes size estimates obtained by flow cytometry (Bennett et al, 2003), we utilized a k-mer approach in this study. Despite this, we found our bioinformatic genome size estimates were all lower (except for Ro, 1C=0.63 pg) than those we obtained earlier by flow cytometry (Becher et al, 2021), the lowest of which was 1C=0.6 pg. While possible, it seems unlikely that most of our samples truly contained less DNA than all samples analysed in our previous study.…”
Section: Measuring Genome Size Differences With K-merscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Knowing about the shortcomings of genome assemblies, which tend to be smaller than genomes size estimates obtained by flow cytometry (Bennett et al, 2003), we utilized a k-mer approach in this study. Despite this, we found our bioinformatic genome size estimates were all lower (except for Ro, 1C=0.63 pg) than those we obtained earlier by flow cytometry (Becher et al, 2021), the lowest of which was 1C=0.6 pg. While possible, it seems unlikely that most of our samples truly contained less DNA than all samples analysed in our previous study.…”
Section: Measuring Genome Size Differences With K-merscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…To associate any genomic copy number differences identified using k-mers with specific repeat types, we used the RepeatExplorer2 output of a previous study (Becher et al, 2021) in which we had carried out an analysis of low-pass sequencing data of several diploid and tetraploid British eyebrights. We selected the first 50 repeat super clusters and concatenated, per super cluster, all contributing reads.…”
Section: Contribution Of Different Repeat Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations