1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00382943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of managerial moral standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 In our initial studies in business ethics, Jim Waters and I first attempted to gain a lively sense of moral issues from the perspective of managers before we began to recommend how they ought to address the ethical issues they faced (see Bird and Waters, 1986;Bird et al, 1990;Waters and Bird, 1987;Waters et al, 1986). 5 It makes considerable difference for methodological reasons whether these typological scales are treated as classificatory schemes of the sort used in biology or chemistry, or as analytical schemes -heuristic indicators -of the sort proposed by a number of social scientists, including especially Weber in his account of ideal types (Weber, 1949, ch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In our initial studies in business ethics, Jim Waters and I first attempted to gain a lively sense of moral issues from the perspective of managers before we began to recommend how they ought to address the ethical issues they faced (see Bird and Waters, 1986;Bird et al, 1990;Waters and Bird, 1987;Waters et al, 1986). 5 It makes considerable difference for methodological reasons whether these typological scales are treated as classificatory schemes of the sort used in biology or chemistry, or as analytical schemes -heuristic indicators -of the sort proposed by a number of social scientists, including especially Weber in his account of ideal types (Weber, 1949, ch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When employees witness inconsistencies between the actual behaviour and the values declared by their superiors, they begin to wonder what the acceptable behaviours in an organisation are (Bird & Waters, 1987;Jensen & Wygant, 1990;McClelland, 1987). Interest in and the need for teamwork and simultaneous effective leadership increase within organisations (Manderscheid & Arichvili, 2008).…”
Section: Anomie At Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the underlying values and criteria can be evaluated from the ethical point of view. (Bassmann & London, 1993;Bird & Waters, 1987;Bird & Waters, 1989;Ciulla, 2011; Destructive leadership behavior can be defined as harming the organizational members or aiming at short term results on the expense of long term consequences. Destructive leadership can also be called unethical leadership.…”
Section: Destructive Leadersmentioning
confidence: 99%