Peace Ethology 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781118922545.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature of Peace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, perceptions of victim distress may motivate bystanders to help as a direct means to relieve the victim’s suffering (Batson, 2011) or to alleviate their own unpleasant arousal from witnessing the emergency (Cialdini et al, 1987; Piliavin, Dovidio, Gaertner, & Clark III, 1981). More broadly, this underlying propensity for empathy with others and third-party peacekeeping behavior is argued to be central for the maintenance of cooperative societal living (de Waal, 2007; Verbeek & Peters, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, perceptions of victim distress may motivate bystanders to help as a direct means to relieve the victim’s suffering (Batson, 2011) or to alleviate their own unpleasant arousal from witnessing the emergency (Cialdini et al, 1987; Piliavin, Dovidio, Gaertner, & Clark III, 1981). More broadly, this underlying propensity for empathy with others and third-party peacekeeping behavior is argued to be central for the maintenance of cooperative societal living (de Waal, 2007; Verbeek & Peters, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, perceptions of victim distress may motivate bystanders to help as a direct means to relieve the victim's suffering (Batson, 2011) or in order to alleviate their own unpleasant arousal from witnessing the emergency (Cialdini et al, 1987;Piliavin, Dovidio, Gaertner, & Clark III, 1981). More broadly, this underlying propensity for empathy with others and third-party peacekeeping behavior is argued to be central for the maintenance of co-operative societal living (de Waal, 2007;Verbeek & Peters, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the recognition of the implications of complexity for peace work have largely inspired ambivalence within the field, this reflects the focus over the past 15 years on the failures of top-down planning and implementation, and not a full recognition that peace systems too are complex. It downplays or even ignores the fact that there are many promising examples of stable peace systems in the world today (Verbeek & Peters, 2018), and that we can, with foresight and effort, develop our capacity as peace workers to assist in the development of trans-scalar peace systems elsewhere. It is certainly true that any habitual coherence to a trans-scalar peace system requires an unlikely revolution in the thinking of global power holders.…”
Section: A Trans-scalar Peace Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%