We consider the differences between the many-pathway protein folding model derived from theoretical energy landscape considerations and the defined-pathway model derived from experiment. A basic tenet of the energy landscape model is that proteins fold through many heterogeneous pathways by way of amino acid-level dynamics biased toward selecting native-like interactions. The many pathways imagined in the model are not observed in the structureformation stage of folding by experiments that would have found them, but they have now been detected and characterized for one protein in the initial prenucleation stage. Analysis presented here shows that these many microscopic trajectories are not distinct in any functionally significant way, and they have neither the structural information nor the biased energetics needed to select native vs. nonnative interactions during folding. The opposed defined-pathway model stems from experimental results that show that proteins are assemblies of small cooperative units called foldons and that a number of proteins fold in a reproducible pathway one foldon unit at a time. Thus, the same foldon interactions that encode the native structure of any given protein also naturally encode its particular foldon-based folding pathway, and they collectively sum to produce the energy bias toward native interactions that is necessary for efficient folding. Available information suggests that quantized native structure and stepwise folding coevolved in ancient repeat proteins and were retained as a functional pair due to their utility for solving the difficult protein folding problem.protein folding | foldons | energy landscape theory P rotein folding is among the most important reactions in all of biology. However, 50 y after C. B. Anfinsen showed that proteins can fold spontaneously without outside help (1, 2), and despite the intensive work of thousands of researchers leading to more than five publications per day in the current literature, there is still no general agreement on the most primary questions (3-5). How do proteins fold? Why do they fold in that way? How is the course of folding encoded in a 1D amino acid sequence? These questions have fundamental significance for protein science and its numerous applications. Over the years these questions have generated a large literature leading to different models for the folding process.The "new view" folding model, derived from hypothetical energy landscape and statistical mechanical considerations (6-12), proposes that folding proteins navigate to their native state through very many independent pathways. The many trajectories in Fig. 1A imply an unfolded protein conformationally searching for its lowestenergy native state by way of dynamic bond rotations in a way that is guided by its energy landscape, as for any chemical reaction. For effective performance, folding proteins must "know" how to select native as opposed to nonnative interactions. This information is said to be contained in the shape of the energy landscape, but how it is ...