1984
DOI: 10.1039/dt9840002237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of the co-ordinate link. Part 11. Synthesis and phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of platinum and palladium complexes containing side-bonded (E)-diphenyldiphosphene. X-Ray crystal and molecular structures of [Pd{(E)-PhPPPh}(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)] and [Pd{[(E)-PhPPPh][W(CO)5]2}(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)]

Abstract: The complexes cis-[MC12L2] react with Li,(PhPPPh) to give [M(PhP=PPh)L,] [M = Pd, L2 = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane (dppe), (1) ; M = Pt, L2 = dppe or (PPh3)2]. Complex (1) reacts with [W(CO),(thf)] (thf = tetrahydrofuran) to give [Pd{(PhP=PPh) [W(CO),],}(dppe)](2). Complexes were characterized by 31 P-{ H} n.m.r. spectroscopy. X-Ray crystal-structure determinations of complexes (1 ) and (2) reveal nearly identical and planar PdP4 moieties comprising the donor atoms of L2 and q2-[(€)-diphenyldiphosphene] … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…X‐ray crystallography (Figure 5) showed, in both cases, a trans disposition of the two aryl substituents in the diphosphene ligand. The P−P bond lengths ( 18 : 2.1379(7) Å; 19 : 2.1342(7) Å) were in good agreement with those in [Ni(PEt 3 ) 2 ( trans ‐MesP=PMes)] (2.1355(9) Å), [Ni(PMe 2 Ph) 2 ( trans ‐MesP=PMes)] (2.137(1) Å), and [Pd(dppe)( trans ‐PhP=PPh)] (2.121(4) Å; dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane), respectively [44,46] . The angles C1−Ni−C11 ( 18 , 104.62(6)°; 19 , 98.85(8)°) were larger than 90°, as expected for a pseudo three‐coordinated complex with small P−Ni−P angles ( 18 , 56.76(2)°; 19 , 56.89(2)°).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…X‐ray crystallography (Figure 5) showed, in both cases, a trans disposition of the two aryl substituents in the diphosphene ligand. The P−P bond lengths ( 18 : 2.1379(7) Å; 19 : 2.1342(7) Å) were in good agreement with those in [Ni(PEt 3 ) 2 ( trans ‐MesP=PMes)] (2.1355(9) Å), [Ni(PMe 2 Ph) 2 ( trans ‐MesP=PMes)] (2.137(1) Å), and [Pd(dppe)( trans ‐PhP=PPh)] (2.121(4) Å; dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane), respectively [44,46] . The angles C1−Ni−C11 ( 18 , 104.62(6)°; 19 , 98.85(8)°) were larger than 90°, as expected for a pseudo three‐coordinated complex with small P−Ni−P angles ( 18 , 56.76(2)°; 19 , 56.89(2)°).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…η 2 -Diphosphene complexes of various transition metals have been known and were thoroughly reviewed by Weber 52. Noteworthy, is the formation of [(Ph 3 P) 2 M(P 2 {C 6 F 5 } 2 )] with an E -configured diphosphene ligand by the degradation of cyclic tetraphosphine P 4 (C 6 F 5 ) 4 in the presence of M(PPh 3 ) 4 (M = Pt,53 Pd54). Other known diphosphene complexes of group 4 include the anionic species [Cp 2 Zr(PPh) 2 Br] – with a P–P distance [2.145(3) Å] shorter than in 3a and 3b ,55 and the related Mes-substituted complex [Cp 2 Zr(P 2 Mes 2 )] with a similar P–P distance [2.188(3) Å] 56.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der P±P-Abstand in der P 2 -Gruppe ist mit 216,4 pm angegeben [6]. Scherer et al [7] beschreiben die Bildung von [(TaL) 3 …”
unclassified