2001
DOI: 10.1086/323569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature of the Compact Supernova Remnants in Starburst Galaxies

Abstract: Radio observations of starburst regions in galaxies have revealed groups of compact nonthermal sources that may be radiative supernova remnants expanding in the interclump medium of molecular clouds. Because of the high pressure in starburst regions, the interclump medium may have a density ~ 10^3 H atoms cm^{-3} in a starburst nucleus like M82 and ~ 10^4 H atoms cm^{-3} in an ultraluminous galaxy like Arp 220. In M82, our model can account for the sizes, the slow evolution, the high radio luminosities, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
95
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger velocities above are much higher (by a factor of 3−22) than the predicted velocities from the model of Chevalier & Fransson (2001), based on the high pressure expected in the interstellar medium (ISM) of M 82. The expansion velocity reported in this paper for SN2008iz is indeed a factor ∼40 larger than the predicted velocities in Chevalier & Fransson (2001), although of the same order-of-magnitude than the velocities reported in Beswick et al (2006) for the other remnants in M 82, and the typical velocities of the other type II supernovae observed to date. Weiler et al (1998) find a correlation between peak radio luminosity at 5 GHz and the time between the explosion and the peak in the 5 GHz light curve for type II supernovae.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Type II Radio Supernovaementioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The larger velocities above are much higher (by a factor of 3−22) than the predicted velocities from the model of Chevalier & Fransson (2001), based on the high pressure expected in the interstellar medium (ISM) of M 82. The expansion velocity reported in this paper for SN2008iz is indeed a factor ∼40 larger than the predicted velocities in Chevalier & Fransson (2001), although of the same order-of-magnitude than the velocities reported in Beswick et al (2006) for the other remnants in M 82, and the typical velocities of the other type II supernovae observed to date. Weiler et al (1998) find a correlation between peak radio luminosity at 5 GHz and the time between the explosion and the peak in the 5 GHz light curve for type II supernovae.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Type II Radio Supernovaementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Estimates of the expansion velocities of other supernova remnants in M 82 (the host galaxy of SN 2008iz) have also been reported to range between ∼1500 and 11 000 km s −1 (Beswick et al 2006). The larger velocities above are much higher (by a factor of 3−22) than the predicted velocities from the model of Chevalier & Fransson (2001), based on the high pressure expected in the interstellar medium (ISM) of M 82. The expansion velocity reported in this paper for SN2008iz is indeed a factor ∼40 larger than the predicted velocities in Chevalier & Fransson (2001), although of the same order-of-magnitude than the velocities reported in Beswick et al (2006) for the other remnants in M 82, and the typical velocities of the other type II supernovae observed to date.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Type II Radio Supernovaementioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, it seems difficult to understand how such a large number of supernovae could be "hidden" without giving raise to non-thermal radio emission especially in such a high density region (cf. Chevalier & Fransson 2001 The answer to this apparent contradiction is simple: the difficulty arises from the fact that a proper geometrical constraint is used here for the first time implying a fairly large ionisation parameter. Had we neglected the information on the spatial extent (or better said, the compactness) of the emission associated with C2, we would easily be able to reconcile the observations with a standard value of M up for any burst age.…”
Section: An "Old" Hidden Compact Cluster?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(see e.g. Chevalier & Fransson 2001). There are also the star-forming molecular clouds Sgr A, Sgr B2 in the Galactic Center region with a strong CS emission from dense molecular gas (e.g.…”
Section: X-ray Emission From An Sn Fragment Interacting With a Molecumentioning
confidence: 99%