1941
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.59.615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature of the Primary Cosmic Radiation and the Origin of the Mesotron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

1954
1954
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Millikan attacked strongly Compton, but after repeating his experiment in 1933 he admitted that there was a latitude effect and that the Cosmic Rays must be (mostly) charged particles. However, it would take until 1941 before it was established in an experiment by Schein [48] that Cosmic Rays was mostly protons.…”
Section: Toward the Final Understanding Of The Origin Of The Radiationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Millikan attacked strongly Compton, but after repeating his experiment in 1933 he admitted that there was a latitude effect and that the Cosmic Rays must be (mostly) charged particles. However, it would take until 1941 before it was established in an experiment by Schein [48] that Cosmic Rays was mostly protons.…”
Section: Toward the Final Understanding Of The Origin Of The Radiationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Однако вопрос об основ-ном составе первичного потока оставался нерешённым ещё в про-должение примерно 15 лет. В 1941 г. был произведён опыт, целью которого было измерение высотного хода электронных ливней в свинце 36 . Оказалось, что на большой высоте (давление ~ 3 см рт.…”
Section: общие свойства первичного космического излученияunclassified
“…L a t e r t h i s concept became s u s p e c t (T. H. Johnson, 1938), and it w a s shown that t h e charged particles a r e protons rather than electrons (M. Schein et al, 1941). T e n y e a r s ago i t w a s discovered that, i n addition t o protons, t h e primary cosmic radiation also c o n s i s t s of heavier nuclei, from t h o s e of helium up to nuclei more m a s s i v e than t h o s e of iron (P. F r e i e r et al, 1948a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%