2006
DOI: 10.1086/510720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature of the Variable Galactic Center Source GCIRS 16SW Revisited: A Massive Eclipsing Binary

Abstract: We present a reanalysis of our H-and K-band photometry and light curves for GCIRS 16SW, a regular periodic source near the Galactic center. These data include those presented by DePoy et al.; we correct a sign error in their reduction, finding GCIRS 16SW to be an eclipsing binary with no color variations. We find the system to be an equal-mass overcontact binary (both stars overfilling their Roche lobes) in a circular orbit with a period days and an inclination angle . This confirms and strengthens the finding… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally both stars within the eclipsing contact binary GC IRS16SW (2×Ofpe/WNLh; Martins et al 2006b) share similar spectral morphologies to LHO110. Peeples et al (2007) derive dynamical masses of ∼ 50M ⊙ for both components of GC IRS16SW; compatible with Gr14 if they are indeed evolving from a B-hypergiant to an LBV phase.…”
Section: Corroboration -Luminosities and Masses Of Cluster Memberssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Finally both stars within the eclipsing contact binary GC IRS16SW (2×Ofpe/WNLh; Martins et al 2006b) share similar spectral morphologies to LHO110. Peeples et al (2007) derive dynamical masses of ∼ 50M ⊙ for both components of GC IRS16SW; compatible with Gr14 if they are indeed evolving from a B-hypergiant to an LBV phase.…”
Section: Corroboration -Luminosities and Masses Of Cluster Memberssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The uncertainty of their results is typically only of the order of a few ×10 per cent, so we did not explore different realizations of the wind data. There is more uncertainty in the wind properties from the 13E group, whose nature is not clearly established yet, and 16SW, which is part of a binary (Martins et al 2006; Peeples et al 2007). The analysis of these sources is not yet robust enough and they are important contributors to the accretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small number of binary stars have been identified in the GC (Martins et al 2006; Peeples et al 2007; Rafelski et al 2007), and, given our current knowledge of disc fragmentation, it is possible that the primordial binary fraction resulting from a fragmenting disc could be significant. Encounters between stars and hard binaries tend to shrink the binary orbit, releasing energy that can heat the system (Heggie 1975; Perets, Kupi & Alexander 2008).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%