2016
DOI: 10.4159/9780674973985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nazi-Fascist New Order for European Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, Martin makes a very important point: the New Order sparked genuine interest because it seemed to address real issues. 25 This is something that comes across clearly throughout our special section, showing how, while engagement with the New Order was marked by an asymmetrical power dynamic, it did not entail directly copying Nazi-fascist ideas and methods. Rather the creation of a milieu in which different political movements pursued their own agendas, accepting, in the case of non-belligerent nations such as Spain, the Nazi-fascist hegemony insofar as it aided them in achieving their own aims and developing their own projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense, Martin makes a very important point: the New Order sparked genuine interest because it seemed to address real issues. 25 This is something that comes across clearly throughout our special section, showing how, while engagement with the New Order was marked by an asymmetrical power dynamic, it did not entail directly copying Nazi-fascist ideas and methods. Rather the creation of a milieu in which different political movements pursued their own agendas, accepting, in the case of non-belligerent nations such as Spain, the Nazi-fascist hegemony insofar as it aided them in achieving their own aims and developing their own projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As Benjamin Martin has demonstrated, the Nazi-fascist cultural New Order, while ultimately aimed at achieving hegemony in Europe, succeeded in mobilising supporters throughout the continent. 23 This was not just a clear manifestation of the pivotal role these countries played within the post-liberal departure from democracy of the interwar period, but also of the mobilising power of the Europeanist discourse. As Ute Frevert has argued, Germany's 'love affair with Europe' in the interwar period had a defensive character that it maintained under Nazi rule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, English in particular was to become the focus of German neophilology as an originally noble Germanic language corrupted by the "French-Jewish disease" of parliamentarism, according to the Nazi ideologist Rosenberg (1930: 643). In this context Martin (2017) claims that German academics during the Third Reich saw the German nation in analogy to the revered culture of Greece, while the French and English were understood as mere civilizations like Rome, perpetuating the Greek culture in diluted, commercialized form.…”
Section: German Linguistics In the Third Reichmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar terms around a 'New Europe' were being debated in quite a few countries on the continent, so that writers, public health experts and women leaders from Axis-allied and occupied countries all over Europe willingly engaged with the different modalities of this Axis internationalism. 54 In this broader context of multilateral projects, the Hitler Youth also carried out its 'cultural work' at European level. The Reichsjugendfu¨hrung (the Reich youth leadership) interpreted these geopolitical changes as a 'clean sweep', recognized in the emergence of 'a new concept of Europe' a broad space for action: the 'recently emerged Europe will be young and will also be a Europe for young people'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%