1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1986.tb03047.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neale Analysis of Reading Ability — Revised

Abstract: Summary. In 1980 steps were undertaken in Australia to commence a review of the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (Neale, 1958) which culminated in a revision and restandardisation of the test in 1984. This paper outlines the major features of this revision and presents data on the reading performance of boys and girls from the standardisation sample drawn from two Australian states, Victoria and South Australia. The results overall suggest that girls and boys do not differ significantly in performance at dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
572
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(581 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
572
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DS and CAM participants were matched for reading comprehension ability as measured by the NARA II, form II (Neale, 1997). The DS and PC groups were also matched for reading comprehension as measured by the NARA II, form II.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DS and CAM participants were matched for reading comprehension ability as measured by the NARA II, form II (Neale, 1997). The DS and PC groups were also matched for reading comprehension as measured by the NARA II, form II.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An 8 year old girl with DS (KS) was found to have a level of reading comprehension significantly below her reading accuracy level when assessed using The Neale Analysis of Reading AbilityRevised (NARA II, form II, Neale, 1997) but not when assessed using the WORD (Wechsler, 1993). Critically, the NARA II includes questions assessing both memory for information presented in the text (literal questions) and questions that require an inference to be made, while the WORD (Wechsler, 1993) contains mainly literal questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The YARC is very similar in format to the The Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (NARA) (Neale, 1989), which has been used in previous studies of reading with DHH children, including Kyle and Harris (2006;. It presents children with a series of graded passages, each illustrated by a picture.…”
Section: Reading Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one methodological issue in these studies concerns the choice of tasks used to reveal the poor comprehender"s profile. Oakhill and colleagues screened and selected poor comprehenders from regular mainstream classrooms based on performance on the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (NARA-II; Neale, 1997). In this reading test, children read aloud short passages of text (generating a score for reading accuracy) and are then asked questions to assess their literal and inferential understanding of the text (generating a score for reading comprehension).…”
Section: Comprehension Difficulties Of Reading Disabled Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%