2002
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2002.6884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Near-Earth Objects Follow-up Program IV. CCD Photometry in 1996–1999

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
40
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our spin solution does not match the one of Krugly et al (2002), mainly because they reported a value of ∼-10 • for the ecliptic latitude. Nevertheless, their rather preliminary pole solutions based on an ellipsoidal shape model assumption are relatively close to both our pole solutions and to the one of Ansdell et al (2014; Table 1).…”
Section: Shape Model and Rotation Statecontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our spin solution does not match the one of Krugly et al (2002), mainly because they reported a value of ∼-10 • for the ecliptic latitude. Nevertheless, their rather preliminary pole solutions based on an ellipsoidal shape model assumption are relatively close to both our pole solutions and to the one of Ansdell et al (2014; Table 1).…”
Section: Shape Model and Rotation Statecontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The recent work of Ansdell et al (2014) based on additional photometric data reported a single pole solution compatible with one of the pole solutions of Krugly et al (2002). This provides a convex shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the data have been obtained by a few dedicated programs (see, e.g., Pravec et al 1998, Mottola et al 1995a, Krugly et al 2002 that placed a high priority within their observational strategies on suppressing selection effects against slow rotators as well as low amplitude objects, and on resolving complex lightcurves of tumblers and binaries among NEAs. Radar observations contributed to the rotation data 2 P. Pravec, A.W.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%