1992
DOI: 10.1080/00043249.1992.10791587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Necessity of Jimmie Durham's Jokes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IACA defines an Indian, Indian tribe, and Indian artisan and, thus, makes political “an ethnic activity—the self-identification of an artist in the promotion and sale of his or her work” (Sheffield, 1997: 4). The act has been highly criticized for its construction of an artistic authenticity grounded in racial and political definitions of identity (see Barker, 2003; Cembalest, 1991; Shiff, 1992; WalkingStick, 1991). However, it has also been called a “paper tiger” because of its lack of enforceability (Duboff, 1992: 44).…”
Section: The Field Of Indian Art and The Negative Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IACA defines an Indian, Indian tribe, and Indian artisan and, thus, makes political “an ethnic activity—the self-identification of an artist in the promotion and sale of his or her work” (Sheffield, 1997: 4). The act has been highly criticized for its construction of an artistic authenticity grounded in racial and political definitions of identity (see Barker, 2003; Cembalest, 1991; Shiff, 1992; WalkingStick, 1991). However, it has also been called a “paper tiger” because of its lack of enforceability (Duboff, 1992: 44).…”
Section: The Field Of Indian Art and The Negative Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, today, there are a large number of Cherokee people who are unable to 'prove' that they are Indian. See Shiff (1992). Shiff quotes from Walkingstick, 'Indian Law', Artforum 30, November 1991: 20-1.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making distinctions between what is modern and what is not, the museum thus implied that contemporary American Indian artists were only in the forefront of their own ethnicity. Indian artist Jimmie Durham escaped such racial typecasting and crossed-over into the contemporary exhibit with a biting sculptural piece from 1992 (also untitled), but only because he has adamantly refused to subscribe to the authenticity of tribal affiliation as implemented in the 1990 Indian Arts and Crafts Act (Shiff 1992, Fine 1994.…”
Section: Displaying Cultural Differencementioning
confidence: 99%