2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for local involvement: Decentralization of disaster management institutions in Baluchistan, Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brooks, Adger, & Kelly, 2005), but no macro-level study has been undertaken on the relationship between political decentralisation and natural hazard-associated disaster outcomes while analysing the mediating role of national wealth, political orientation and local representation. Cross-national studies in this area either have dwelt on fiscal decentralisation (Ahmed & Iqbal, 2009;Escaleras & Register, 2012;Skidmore & Toya, 2013;Yamamura, 2012) or are case studies (Ainuddin, Aldrich, Routray, Ainuddin, & Achkazai, 2013;Blackburn, 2014;Marks & Lebel, 2016). Using cross-country data over the 1950-2006 period, our study reveals that political decentralisation is correlated with disaster outcomes, and hence indicates the importance of focusing new disaster mitigation initiatives and future disaster risk reduction research on this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brooks, Adger, & Kelly, 2005), but no macro-level study has been undertaken on the relationship between political decentralisation and natural hazard-associated disaster outcomes while analysing the mediating role of national wealth, political orientation and local representation. Cross-national studies in this area either have dwelt on fiscal decentralisation (Ahmed & Iqbal, 2009;Escaleras & Register, 2012;Skidmore & Toya, 2013;Yamamura, 2012) or are case studies (Ainuddin, Aldrich, Routray, Ainuddin, & Achkazai, 2013;Blackburn, 2014;Marks & Lebel, 2016). Using cross-country data over the 1950-2006 period, our study reveals that political decentralisation is correlated with disaster outcomes, and hence indicates the importance of focusing new disaster mitigation initiatives and future disaster risk reduction research on this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Djalante, Holley, and Thomalla (2011) recognise the importance of polycentric and multi-layered institutions, and following Tompkins, Lemos, and Boyd (2008), the central role of participation and collaboration, self-organisation and effective local networks in post-disaster recovery. Ainuddin et al (2013) identify the usefulness of efficient preparedness and coordination of provisional and national level agencies to enhance community awareness and preparedness. According to Wisner et al (2004) and Marks and Lebel (2016), greater local participation in decisions is expected to lead to more appropriate and sustainable disaster risk reduction interventions.…”
Section: Disaster Risk Reduction As An Evolving Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case, the approach is not well implemented at these levels, the effectiveness is reduced, so that the gap was reported after the 2005 earthquake in Kashmir followed by NDMA by the Pakistani government[15]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their deep knowledge of local conditions, the voices of disaster victims are critical during community recovery after disaster (Onstad et al., ). As the emergency management institutions in Pakistan are highly centralized and do not involve local people, disaster victims rarely participate in decision‐making (Ainuddin, Aldrich, Routray, Ainuddin & Achkazai, ).…”
Section: Disasters and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%