2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for new search strategies for fourth generation quarks at the LHC

Abstract: Most limits on the fourth generation heavy top quark (the t ) are based on the assumed dominance of t → W b, which is expected to be case in the minimal fourth generation framework with a single Higgs (the so called SM4). Here we show, within a variant of a Two Higgs Doublet Model with four generations of fermions, that, in general, a different t detection strategy is required if the physics that underlies the new heavy fermionic degrees of freedom goes beyond the "naive" SM4. We find that the recent CMS lower… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(107 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This minimal framework has, however, several drawbacks [16] and, more importantly, it fails to account for the existence of the recently discovered 125 GeV Higgs-like particle [17]. On the other hand, a fourth-generation framework with two (or more) Higgs doublets, such as the h4G2HDM discussed here, where the new heavy quarks have masses of Oð500 GeVÞ, is not only consistent with the current Higgs data 3 , but it can also have specific flavor structures, which may give rise to new signatures of fourth-generation quarks at the LHC [16,18], and substantially relax the current bounds on their masses [19]. Moreover, the lightest Higgs state in these class of models may be a good candidate for the recently discovered 125 GeV Higgs-like particle [20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This minimal framework has, however, several drawbacks [16] and, more importantly, it fails to account for the existence of the recently discovered 125 GeV Higgs-like particle [17]. On the other hand, a fourth-generation framework with two (or more) Higgs doublets, such as the h4G2HDM discussed here, where the new heavy quarks have masses of Oð500 GeVÞ, is not only consistent with the current Higgs data 3 , but it can also have specific flavor structures, which may give rise to new signatures of fourth-generation quarks at the LHC [16,18], and substantially relax the current bounds on their masses [19]. Moreover, the lightest Higgs state in these class of models may be a good candidate for the recently discovered 125 GeV Higgs-like particle [20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In particular, in [12] the condensates which drive DEWSB are formed by exchanges of the fundamental Higgs, while in [14] a hybrid setup similar to ours was constructed in the top-condensation scenario. 3 For discussions on the phenomenology of multi-Higgs fourthgeneration models, see e.g., [13,16,[18][19][20][21]. couplings are sub-critical and, therefore, do not play any role in DEWSB (see also discussion below).…”
Section: Dynamical Ew Symmetry Breaking With Heavy Fermions: a Hymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if b ′ → tH − dominates the b ′ decays, then gg → b ′b′ will lead to, e.g., a ttH − H + → 4t + 2b signature as opposed to the "standard" 2t + 2W one when the b ′ decays via b ′ → tW [93]. Clearly, these new 4th generation quark signatures deserve a detailed investigation which is beyond the scope of this paper and will be considered elsewhere [94].…”
Section: Phenomenology Of the Yukawa Sector In The 4g2hdm-imentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the 4th generation fermion masses involved in the loops of the decays h → V V (i.e., in the 1-loop NLO corrections for the cases h → ZZ * , W W * ), we have used the approximation of a degenerate 4th generation fermion sector, where we have tested below two representative cases: on Γ(h → V V ) is negligible). It is important to note that, while the first case (M 4G = 400 GeV) is excluded for the SM4 [20], it is not necessarily excluded for the 4G2HDM, since in this model the decay patterns of t ′ and b ′ can have a completely different topology, e.g., having BR (t ′ → th) ∼ 1, for which the current limits (which are based on the "standard" SM4 decays t ′ → bW and b ′ → tW ) do not apply, see [52].…”
Section: Model XXmentioning
confidence: 99%