2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2001.00210.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The needs of informal carers: a proposed assessment tool for use by public health nurses

Abstract: The carers and PHNs found the assessment tool to be useful and comprehensive in its approach. However, it requires modification, with specific attention being paid to the validity and reliability of the tool.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Research consistently demonstrates that there is a greater demand for information regarding discharge from the carers and family than from the users of services (Tierney & Closs, 1993). According to Syron (2001) most health care in the community is provided by informal carers, yet it is only in recent years that their needs have begun to be highlighted. The increasing role of family in supporting older people following discharge was identified in research by Waters et al.…”
Section: Carer and Family Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research consistently demonstrates that there is a greater demand for information regarding discharge from the carers and family than from the users of services (Tierney & Closs, 1993). According to Syron (2001) most health care in the community is provided by informal carers, yet it is only in recent years that their needs have begun to be highlighted. The increasing role of family in supporting older people following discharge was identified in research by Waters et al.…”
Section: Carer and Family Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1996, Pöhlmann & Hofer 1997, Fuchs 1998, Faison et al. 1999, Klie 1999, Ewers & Schaeffer 2000, Gilberg 2000, Künemund & Hollstein 2000, Schaeffer 2000, Fleming Courts et al 2001, Schaeffer & Moers 2000, Schulz‐Nieswandt 2000, Noelle‐Naumann & Haumann 2001, Syron & Shelley 2001, Bartholomeyczik 2002, Moers & Schaeffer 2002, Stuck et al. 2002, Tichawa 2002, Wackerbarth & Johnson 2002, Wingenfeld & Schnabel 2002, Frich 2003).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…2002). It would appear that members of the general public rely on PHNs to interpret community entitlements on their behalf (Syron & Shelley 2001, McKeown 2007). Recent reports have emphasized the difficulties experienced by carers and families in accessing information about entitlements to community service (Comhairle 2002, Browne 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%