2022
DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04870-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The negative impact of most relevant infections on fertility and assisted reproduction technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 253 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, during the lockdown period, a significant decrease in admissions to the emergency units was also found for obstetric-gynecological conditions [16][17][18][19][20][21], and even for important tests, such as invasive prenatal diagnosis, a drop in the number of procedures was noted [22], clearly showing that pregnant women were more concerned than others of contracting the infection and suffering from the COVID-19 disease [23,24]. Moreover, reproductive medicine had to cease treatment unless for fertility preservation due to oncologic reasons, with consequences also on fertility and natality rates, opening a debate on the urgency to reduce time to pregnancy in women with poor prognosis [25][26][27][28][29]. Very soon, it appeared clear that pregnant women should have been considered a population at increased risk for severe forms of infection and therefore adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: F O R P U B L I C a T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, during the lockdown period, a significant decrease in admissions to the emergency units was also found for obstetric-gynecological conditions [16][17][18][19][20][21], and even for important tests, such as invasive prenatal diagnosis, a drop in the number of procedures was noted [22], clearly showing that pregnant women were more concerned than others of contracting the infection and suffering from the COVID-19 disease [23,24]. Moreover, reproductive medicine had to cease treatment unless for fertility preservation due to oncologic reasons, with consequences also on fertility and natality rates, opening a debate on the urgency to reduce time to pregnancy in women with poor prognosis [25][26][27][28][29]. Very soon, it appeared clear that pregnant women should have been considered a population at increased risk for severe forms of infection and therefore adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: F O R P U B L I C a T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, pelvic infections, such as chlamydia, mycoplasma, and ureaplasma, seem to be related to a longer period to achieve pregnancy and increased rates of pregnancy loss [17,18]. Bacterial vaginosis has also been considered an obstetrical and gynecological issue, and the link between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth has been intensely studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection that was first identified in December 2019 remains a major public health issue [ 1 , 2 ]. Obstetrics and gynecology practice has undergone many changes during the last 2 years [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%