1995
DOI: 10.1108/14635789510099445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The negative leasehold

Abstract: There have always been situations where tenants, for one reason or another, have paid rents in excess of open market rental value. The position today, due to the downturn in the letting market, is that many more tenants are now in this position. This poses a problem for valuation surveyors when asked to express an opinion on value for sale, negative or reverse premiums, and on value for asset valuation purposes where negative values must be specified. A further point for consideration is the issue raised by th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions relate to the demand and supply, governed by the location, building quality, size, form of occupational lease, etc. which are unaffected by the legal interest being valued (Gane, 1995 ;Mackmin, 1995). Hence the annual rental growth rate of 7.02% is used in the leasehold valuation.…”
Section: The Linkage Between Commercial Property Markets National Economy and Secured Lending Valuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions relate to the demand and supply, governed by the location, building quality, size, form of occupational lease, etc. which are unaffected by the legal interest being valued (Gane, 1995 ;Mackmin, 1995). Hence the annual rental growth rate of 7.02% is used in the leasehold valuation.…”
Section: The Linkage Between Commercial Property Markets National Economy and Secured Lending Valuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated, there are major limitations in valuation capacity to manage this model at present. Leasehold valuation models have been an ongoing source of contention in the UK (e.g., Baum & Crosby, 1988;Gane, 1995;Mackmin, 1995;Trott, 1980Trott, , 1986 because of: the adoption of low accumulative rates in the dual rate approach; remunerative rates that relate to the differing implied growth in freeholds; confusion of taxation adjustments; diffi culties in adjusting for variable profi t rents; the complexity of gearing; and, the major challenges in comparative analysis of leasehold sales. Moreover, managing the interest during a lease renewal will require a good understanding of leasehold valuation, particularly as the level of ownership in the landlord's interest moves fi rmly towards the full ownership of land and improvements.…”
Section: Spike Boydellmentioning
confidence: 99%