2013
DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2013.800453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neighbourhood Unit Concept and the Shaping of Land Planning in the United States 1912–1968

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the primary legal mechanism for development based on the neighborhood unit in the United States was the 1934 National Housing Act (Brody 2013), which created the FHA with a mandate to provide mortgage and construction insurance for the private home building industry. Acting as an insurer, the FHA applied principles of the neighborhood unit in its underwriting standards.…”
Section: Transatlantic Exchangementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, the primary legal mechanism for development based on the neighborhood unit in the United States was the 1934 National Housing Act (Brody 2013), which created the FHA with a mandate to provide mortgage and construction insurance for the private home building industry. Acting as an insurer, the FHA applied principles of the neighborhood unit in its underwriting standards.…”
Section: Transatlantic Exchangementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The correlation between land use and mobility within a two‐dimensional zone is reminiscent of early static location models linking concentric bands of productivity to proximity of transport, with explicit or implied gradients of density and urbanity spiralling out from a dense urban core to expansive rural areas, omitting rural‐urban hybridity and predicated on universal mathematical reasoning characterized by a disregard for local specificity (Barnes, ). Indeed, TOD is often proposed on the same generic terms of ‘boilerplate’ urbanism seen in older spatial templates such as the Radburn plan and the ‘neighbourhood unit’ (Banerjee and Baer, ; Girling, ; Newman and Kenworthy, ; Brody, ), a hierarchy of roads based on level‐of‐service norms (Meyer and Miller, ; Milam et al, ), and Euclidean zoning for what are presumed to be undifferentiated ‘greenfield’ sites (van der Ryn and Cowan, ). Articulated as it is in generic and reproducible terms, the TOD circle has been widely applied through policy, making it an exemplar of the mobility of planning strategies (Allen et al, ; Harris and Moore, ; Healey, ; Baker and Temenos, ; Ward, ).…”
Section: Tod and The Ubiquitous 10‐minute Circlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements are applicable for neighbourhoods in emerging cities as they aim at adapting population growth in urban centres. It also took into account the level of accessibility of residents from their houses to schools and community centres (Rohe 2009;Brody 2013). According to Patricios (2002), Perry has stated that the 'neighbourhood unit is described as a scheme of arrangement for the family life community', where it offers residents a convenient access to the neighbourhood facilities such as schools, parks, shops, and public facilities.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%