2015
DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2015.1045332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neoliberal turn in environmental governance in the Detroit River Area of Concern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neoliberalism as a governing logic prioritizes market-based responses to environmental problemsthough it does not, as is sometimes assumed, oppose a strong role for state intervention to create and maintain those markets. From an environmental justice perspective, neoliberal governance involves a turn towards NGOs as stand-ins for the public, diminishing effective democratic control (Alstyne 2015). The diffusion of neoliberal ways of thinking within state agencies also tends to weaken the power of non-market based issue framings, even in regulatory bureaucracies that adopt the language of environmental justice (Liévanos 2012).…”
Section: Justice Denied: the Failure Of Eco-legalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neoliberalism as a governing logic prioritizes market-based responses to environmental problemsthough it does not, as is sometimes assumed, oppose a strong role for state intervention to create and maintain those markets. From an environmental justice perspective, neoliberal governance involves a turn towards NGOs as stand-ins for the public, diminishing effective democratic control (Alstyne 2015). The diffusion of neoliberal ways of thinking within state agencies also tends to weaken the power of non-market based issue framings, even in regulatory bureaucracies that adopt the language of environmental justice (Liévanos 2012).…”
Section: Justice Denied: the Failure Of Eco-legalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I believe that this view of the state is compatible with the claim, made by theorists of governance, that the configuration of power has changed in advanced capitalist societies, away from a preference for government, centralized and bureaucratic, and towards a logic of governance, with social power and authority seemingly 'decentered', networked, and non-hierarchical (Brown 2015, 122-27). Markets are the key model and technology of this neoliberal form of administration (Lockie 2014), which favors 'partnerships' to mobilize non-state actors (Alstyne 2015) and involves a depoliticized fetish for 'problem-solving' and 'consensus' between 'stakeholders'. State agencies structured around a logic of governance struggle to integrate movement framings based around justice, or even agent-driven politics as such (Liévanos 2012).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%