2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00068289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neolithic burial sequence at Flintbek LA 3, north Germany, and its cart tracks: a precise chronology

Abstract: Radiocarbon dating of 32 stratigraphic samples aided by Bayesian analysis has allowed the author to produce a high precision chronology for the construction and development of a continental Neolithic long barrow for the first time. She shows when and how quickly people living on the shore of the Baltic adopted pit graves, megalithic chambers and long barrows. Better than that, she provides a date for the famous cart tracks beneath the final barrow to 3420–3385 cal BC. Although other parts of the package — plou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, an even later megalithic expansion occurred in the second half of the fourth millennium in northern Germany and southern Scandinavia (22–24). In the Mediterranean, there is a megalithic revival in the second millennium cal BC in the Balearic Islands, Apulia, and Sicily.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, an even later megalithic expansion occurred in the second half of the fourth millennium in northern Germany and southern Scandinavia (22–24). In the Mediterranean, there is a megalithic revival in the second millennium cal BC in the Balearic Islands, Apulia, and Sicily.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this tentative pattern may partly reflect the actual rapidity with which this technology spread across Eurasia, it has also complicated attempts to identify its origins . However, a less conspicuous occurrence of the wheel and axle combination appears to predate the emergence of cattle‐drawn carts and wagons by at least a couple of centuries.…”
Section: Recognizing Play Objects and Object Play In The Archeologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these aspects of material culture are usually discussed exclusively in terms of socialization, 64 While this tentative pattern may partly reflect the actual rapidity with which this technology spread across Eurasia, it has also complicated attempts to identify its origins. 65,66 However, a less conspicuous occurrence of the wheel and axle combination appears to predate the emergence of cattle-drawn carts and wagons by at least a couple of centuries. In Tripolye culture contexts of the northwestern Pontic region (mainly present-day Ukraine) dating to the first half of the sixth millennium BP, a range of small zoomorphic ceramic vessels are found, which seem to have been equipped with holes for axles ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Re Cog Ni Zi N G P L Ay Obj E Cts a N D Obj Ec T P L Ay I mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The combined 14 C dates obtained for the Rudki-type double spiral ornament DSO_1 (Kałdus, Poland) (OxCal v. 4.3) Bronocice (Poland) is dated to 3635-3370 cal BC (with a 68.2% probability) (Bakker et al 1999). Relying on a radiocarbon result of 3420-3385 cal BC (with a 68.2% probability) from the wagon track remains discovered in Flintbek (Germany) (Mischka 2011(Mischka , 2013, a 3502-3363 cal BC date range (with a 68.2% probability) obtained for the ceremonial pit no. 1186 (see Tables 1 and 5) The importance of the motif incised on the amphora from Kałdus relies not only in the fact that it may represent a model of a wagon, but also in a possibility that it could have been inspired by the shape of the double spiral ornament.…”
Section: Contextual Significancementioning
confidence: 99%