“…The 15 P 5 juvenility index remains a widely accepted tool in paleodemography and may be suitable for those samples where either differential preservation and recovery or cultural practices have led to an apparent underrepresentation of infants (Bocquet‐Appel & Naji, ; Hershkovitz & Gopher, ; Kohler, Glaude, Bocquet‐Appel, & Kemp, ; Kohler & Reese, ; Lesure, Martin, Bishop, Jackson, & Chykerda, ). However, this is not always the case and in Southeast Asia, for instance, infants are often well represented in skeletal assemblages and the use of the 15 P 5 juvenility index may fail to accurately represent the demographic parameters of such populations (Bellwood & Oxenham, ).…”