2014
DOI: 10.1086/678325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neolithic Demographic Transition in Mesoamerica

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 15 P 5 juvenility index remains a widely accepted tool in paleodemography and may be suitable for those samples where either differential preservation and recovery or cultural practices have led to an apparent underrepresentation of infants (Bocquet‐Appel & Naji, ; Hershkovitz & Gopher, ; Kohler, Glaude, Bocquet‐Appel, & Kemp, ; Kohler & Reese, ; Lesure, Martin, Bishop, Jackson, & Chykerda, ). However, this is not always the case and in Southeast Asia, for instance, infants are often well represented in skeletal assemblages and the use of the 15 P 5 juvenility index may fail to accurately represent the demographic parameters of such populations (Bellwood & Oxenham, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 15 P 5 juvenility index remains a widely accepted tool in paleodemography and may be suitable for those samples where either differential preservation and recovery or cultural practices have led to an apparent underrepresentation of infants (Bocquet‐Appel & Naji, ; Hershkovitz & Gopher, ; Kohler, Glaude, Bocquet‐Appel, & Kemp, ; Kohler & Reese, ; Lesure, Martin, Bishop, Jackson, & Chykerda, ). However, this is not always the case and in Southeast Asia, for instance, infants are often well represented in skeletal assemblages and the use of the 15 P 5 juvenility index may fail to accurately represent the demographic parameters of such populations (Bellwood & Oxenham, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the social value ascribed to maize may have shifted after 1000 BC (Rosenswig et al 2015; VanDerwarker and Kruger 2012), during what we refer to as the high-productivity phase of the ADT, it is clear that maize was a significant component of the diet from the beginning of the Formative (Bérubé et al 2020; Hepp et al 2017; Kennett et al 2020; Lesure et al 2021). An analysis of proportions of young individuals in human skeletal assemblages is also consistent with a long Mesoamerican ADT beginning at 1900 BC and extending throughout the Formative (Lesure et al 2014).…”
Section: Temporal Structurementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The NDT has since been detected elsewhere (Bocquet-Appel and Bar-Yosef 2008), confirming the utility of the concept but also showing that it played out in different places in different ways (e.g., Lesure et al 2014; Schlanger and Craig 2012). Kohler and colleagues (2008) applied the concept in a collaborative effort known as the Village Ecodynamics Project, focused on southwest Colorado and northern New Mexico.…”
Section: The Neolithic Demographic Transitionmentioning
confidence: 65%