2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Environmental Stressors and Supports

Abstract: The relationship between maternal mental health and infant development has been established in the literature. The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is a particularly challenging environment for new mothers as several natural processes are disrupted. The objective of this study is to elucidate protective factors and environmental deficits associated with the NICU. The experiences of forty-six (n = 46) mothers of infants admitted to a Level III NICU in the Midwestern United States, who responded to a related … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
77
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
10
77
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to staff, the perceived positive value of their role in the provision of parental support was purported by Turner et al () and in Trajkovski's , Schmied, Vickers, and Jackson () work on the necessity for collaborative family‐centred care. The parents views on the neonatal environment as having a significant impact on their experience were consistent with various authors (Cleveland, ; Hall & Brinchmann, ; Williams et al, ); certainly, providing an environment that encourages proximity and avoids physical barriers was seen to be a source of comfort, in line with the term “emotional closeness” stated by Flacking, Thomson, and Axelin (). For transitions within neonatal care, parents voiced mixed emotions commonplace through the trajectory of neonatal care (Ballantyne et al, ), and regarding going home, persistent accounts of emotional stress have been reported in relation to both the very premature (Petty, Whiting, Green, & Fowler, ) and the late premature baby (Premji et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In relation to staff, the perceived positive value of their role in the provision of parental support was purported by Turner et al () and in Trajkovski's , Schmied, Vickers, and Jackson () work on the necessity for collaborative family‐centred care. The parents views on the neonatal environment as having a significant impact on their experience were consistent with various authors (Cleveland, ; Hall & Brinchmann, ; Williams et al, ); certainly, providing an environment that encourages proximity and avoids physical barriers was seen to be a source of comfort, in line with the term “emotional closeness” stated by Flacking, Thomson, and Axelin (). For transitions within neonatal care, parents voiced mixed emotions commonplace through the trajectory of neonatal care (Ballantyne et al, ), and regarding going home, persistent accounts of emotional stress have been reported in relation to both the very premature (Petty, Whiting, Green, & Fowler, ) and the late premature baby (Premji et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The physical environment can be thought through carefully with comfort and family inclusion in mind, in line with the delivery of safe, clinical care of the baby. This can happen in conjunction with staff education on the importance of communication and empathic care (Williams et al, ) emphasising how all these areas link together to facilitate ongoing emotional care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nurses working in such units need to acknowledge the challenges experienced by mothers and plan effective care to meet the needs of both baby and mother. Provision of timely and comprehensive information to mothers on the condition, treatment and care of their babies (Gaucher & Payot, ; Steyn et al, ) could relieve mothers' anxiety and also promote confidence in the healthcare team (Arzani, Valizadeh, Zamanzadeh, & Mohammadi, ; Williams et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%