1980
DOI: 10.2307/1563545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nesting of Chelydra serpentina in Northern New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although nest predation seems to be the primary factor in recruitment reduction across a variety of turtle species and regions (Petokas and Alexander 1980;Christens and Bider 1987;Congdon et al 1987;Robinson and Bider 1988;Kolbe and Janzen 2002;Ernst and Lovich 2009), including wood turtles in the western portion of their range (Harding 2008), flooding appears to be the predominant factor in nest destruction in Iowa. Flooding, excessive rainfall, and increased storm events are known to negatively affect hatching success and recruitment across a wide range of turtle species (Ragotskie 1959;Roze 1964;Plummer 1976;Christens and Bider 1987;Van Houtan and Bass 2007).…”
Section: Detriments To Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although nest predation seems to be the primary factor in recruitment reduction across a variety of turtle species and regions (Petokas and Alexander 1980;Christens and Bider 1987;Congdon et al 1987;Robinson and Bider 1988;Kolbe and Janzen 2002;Ernst and Lovich 2009), including wood turtles in the western portion of their range (Harding 2008), flooding appears to be the predominant factor in nest destruction in Iowa. Flooding, excessive rainfall, and increased storm events are known to negatively affect hatching success and recruitment across a wide range of turtle species (Ragotskie 1959;Roze 1964;Plummer 1976;Christens and Bider 1987;Van Houtan and Bass 2007).…”
Section: Detriments To Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we infer that the increased visual and olfactory detectability of snapping turtle nests renders them more likely to be encountered by opportunistic predators. Other Weld investigations have also shown that painted turtles experience lower nest predation rates [mean: »36% (range: 0-77%); Tinkle et al 1981;Snow 1982;Lindeman 1991;Kolbe and Janzen 2002;Congdon et al 2003;Bowen and Janzen 2005;Rowe et al 2005] than snapping turtles [mean: »77% (range: 59-94%) ;Hammer 1969;Petokas and Alexander 1980;Congdon et al 1987]. By implication, the putatively heightened crypsis of painted turtle nests apparently lowers their susceptibility to predation relative to snapping turtle nests across a broad range of conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Turtle nests in PPNP are potentially subject to predation by a variety of species including coyote (Canis latrans), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), and Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana). However, the primary predators of turtle nests in PPNP are raccoons (Browne and Hecnar 2007), which are generalist feeders known to forage intensively along freshwater shorelines (Llewellyn and Uhler 1952) and that commonly attack nests of a variety of freshwater chelonians (e.g., Petokas and Alexander 1980;Congdon et al 1987;Marchand and Litvaitis 2004) and ground-nesting birds (e.g., Zoellick et al 2004;Ellis et al 2007). Raccoon densities in PPNP are higher than those that typify rural Ontario (Browne and Hecnar 2007).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alguns autores discordam da influência das características físicas das praias na escolha dos locais de desova de tartarugas marinhas (Stancyk & Ross, 1978) e de tartarugas de água doce (Petokas & Alexander, 1980;Pezzuti & Vogt, 1999) ou no sucesso da eclosão ou na razão sexual dos filhotes (Maxwell et al, 1988). Porém mesmo que a temperatura de incubação dos ninhos de tartaruga marinha varie pouco nos ambientes tropicais (Spotila et al, 1987;Mrosovsky et al, 1984), já que a profundidade e os locais escolhidos pelas fêmeas minimizam os efeitos do ambiente (Binckley et al, 1998), é inegável a influência que o local de desova terá no sucesso da eclosão (Ferreira Júnior et al, 2003b;Ferreira Júnior & Castro, 2005) e na razão sexual dos filhotes (Hays et al, 2001).…”
Section: Influência Das Características Dos Ninhos No Desenvolvimentounclassified