Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures 1992
DOI: 10.1145/140901.141883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The network architecture of the Connection Machine CM-5 (extended abstract)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps most closely related to our efforts are various efforts in building scalable interconnects, largely coming out of the supercomputer and massively parallel processing (MPP) communities. Many MPP interconnects have been organized as fat-trees, including systems from Thinking Machines [31,22] and SGI [33]. Thinking Machines employed pseudo-random forwarding decisions to perform load balancing among fat-tree links.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps most closely related to our efforts are various efforts in building scalable interconnects, largely coming out of the supercomputer and massively parallel processing (MPP) communities. Many MPP interconnects have been organized as fat-trees, including systems from Thinking Machines [31,22] and SGI [33]. Thinking Machines employed pseudo-random forwarding decisions to perform load balancing among fat-tree links.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RELATED WORK Fat-Tree Networks: Fat trees have been used for decades in the HPC field. Perhaps the most famous example is the Thinking Machines CM-5 [6]. The CM-5 used proprietary 8-port switch ASICs with a custom frame format.…”
Section: B Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But as the number of packet switches grows, so does the cabling complexity and the difficulty of actually constructing the network, especially on a tight schedule and with a minimum amount of human error. Fat trees have been used successfully in telecom networks [5], HPC networks [6], and on chips [7], but not yet in data center Ethernet networks. One reason is the fear of the resulting cabling complexity from trying to interconnect thousands of individual switches and the overhead of managing a large number of individual switch elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network designs: The history of on-chip networks begins with off-chip, large-scale system interconnects. This previous art used a variety of topologies, amongst them the ones we will include in our study: fat tree [20], butterfly [6], mesh [6] and ring [6]. Present and future multi-core designs demand much more than a simple integration of earlier large-scale system interconnects onto a single die.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%