2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural basis of agency: An fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
80
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
9
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Activations in areas surrounding TPJ are consistent with previous studies Nahab et al 2010;Schnell et al 2007;Spengler et al 2009;Yomogida et al 2010). Interestingly this activity is more present in external-agency condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Activations in areas surrounding TPJ are consistent with previous studies Nahab et al 2010;Schnell et al 2007;Spengler et al 2009;Yomogida et al 2010). Interestingly this activity is more present in external-agency condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, we used the ''related articles'' function on PubMed to identify additional papers. This search revealed seven additional papers (Corradi-Dell'Acqua et al 2008;Kontaris et al 2009;Matsuzawa et al 2005;Nahab et al 2010;Spengler et al 2009;Yomogida et al 2010;Tsakiris et al 2010) making a total of 31 studies.…”
Section: Studies Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jaak Panksepp has pioneered the exploration of the roles subcortical brain structures and primitive affects play in adaptive functioning and in psychopathology [13][14][15], while research by Michael Frank, Jeremy Schmahmann, Carol Seger, James Houk, Robert Miller, and Gregory Ashby, among others, has supported a more holistic model of cognition and cognitive development that appreciates the brain's vertical organization [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Brain-behavior relationships in which cortical and subcortical structures play integrated roles have been "modeled" computationally and have been supported by a range of experimental and brain imaging studies [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the supposed role of the cerebellum in encoding of sensory prediction errors (e.g. Schlerf et al, 2012;Schultz and Dickinson, 2000;Simpson et al, 1996) and processing of agency errors (Yomogida et al, 2010) with a specific focus on human actions (Avanzino et al, 2015), the SEF and the cerebellum seem to be well-suited to signal a mismatch between the predicted dot motion based on the instruction of human agency and the actually perceived nonbiological dot motion leading to higher activation in these areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%