2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural basis of novelty and appropriateness in processing of creative chunk decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
126
2
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
9
126
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in bilateral IFG activity may reflect higher cognitive demands to integrate nonliteral meanings, as opposed to literal ones, into a sentence context or regulate the meaning selection and evaluation during metaphor comprehension, as it is necessary to decide whether the meaning of a word is intended to be literal or nonliteral (Rapp, Erb, Grodd, Bartels, & Markert, 2011;Rapp et al, 2012). However, IFG activation also is found in insightful problem solving, such as in chunk decomposition task (Huang et al, 2015) and compound remote-associates task (Kizilirmak et al, 2016). Because such trials require semantic selection to obtain an insightful solution, IFG stimulation may primarily reflect the breaking of mental set and set shift (Shen, Luo, Liu, & Yuan, 2013).…”
Section: General Neural Network Involved In Basic Metaphorical Languamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in bilateral IFG activity may reflect higher cognitive demands to integrate nonliteral meanings, as opposed to literal ones, into a sentence context or regulate the meaning selection and evaluation during metaphor comprehension, as it is necessary to decide whether the meaning of a word is intended to be literal or nonliteral (Rapp, Erb, Grodd, Bartels, & Markert, 2011;Rapp et al, 2012). However, IFG activation also is found in insightful problem solving, such as in chunk decomposition task (Huang et al, 2015) and compound remote-associates task (Kizilirmak et al, 2016). Because such trials require semantic selection to obtain an insightful solution, IFG stimulation may primarily reflect the breaking of mental set and set shift (Shen, Luo, Liu, & Yuan, 2013).…”
Section: General Neural Network Involved In Basic Metaphorical Languamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important early neuroimaging study on insight found that receiving the answer to a riddle increased hippocampal activity (Luo & Niki, 2003). Other research found that the hippocampus and amygdala were both activated by induced or self-generated insight in a perceptual task, as well as in a compound remote-associates task (Huang, Fan, & Luo, 2015;Kizilirmak, Thuerich, Folta-Schoofs, Schott, & Richardson-Klavehn, 2016;Ludmer, Dudai, & Rubin, 2011;Tik et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2013). The literature on metaphorical language comprehension has featured scant discussion of the hippocampus and amygdala.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8] 和汉字相减任务范式的研究 [10~12] , 创 造性组块分解的认知神经机制愈加清晰. 从认知加 工来看, 组块分解不仅需要打破多重的困难如组块 熟悉性和组块紧密性 [11,12] , 而且涉及多个信息加工 过程如视觉输入的减弱 [7,8] 和知觉转换中的表征更 新 [10,11] . 从神经机制层面看, 组块分解涉及多个脑区 的神经活动的参与, 包括初/高级视觉皮层 [7,8] 、顶叶 和额叶等 [7,10,11] 以及不同通路的有效连接 [12] .…”
Section: P300效应unclassified
“…而且从 电生理指标上看, 组块分解还与alpha波的活动以及 P300有关 [8,11] . 不同的范式具有不同的特点, 例如, 汉字转换任务可以探测到早期视觉活动对组块分解 结合Huang等人 [10] 和本研究可以看出, 组块分解 过程与新异性加工紧密相关. 新异性被广泛认为是 创造性的核心成分 [26~28] , 而顿悟问题解决作为重要 的创造性形式, 其关键之一也是加工新异性 [29,30] .…”
Section: P300效应unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation