2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss

Abstract: During hearing, acoustic signals travel up the ascending auditory pathway from the cochlea to auditory cortex; efferent connections provide descending feedback. In human listeners, although auditory and cognitive processing have sometimes been viewed as separate domains, a growing body of work suggests they are intimately coupled. Here we review the effects of hearing loss on neural systems supporting spoken language comprehension, beginning with age-related physiological decline. We suggest that listeners rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
197
3
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
11
197
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the interventions available for age-associated performance declines, addressing the immediate (Wingfield and Lash, 2016) and long-term (Lin, 2011; Peelle and Wingfield, 2016) cognitive consequences of hearing impairment is among the most direct. The delay in seeking hearing healthcare thus remains a critical public health issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the interventions available for age-associated performance declines, addressing the immediate (Wingfield and Lash, 2016) and long-term (Lin, 2011; Peelle and Wingfield, 2016) cognitive consequences of hearing impairment is among the most direct. The delay in seeking hearing healthcare thus remains a critical public health issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, barring significant neuropathology or serious hearing impairment, comprehension of spoken language remains one of the best-preserved of our cognitive functions (Wingfield and Stine-Morrow, 2000; Peelle and Wingfield, 2016). Underlying this success, however, one may still ask: (1) whether such comprehension occurs as rapidly for older adults relative to younger adults; and (2) whether older adults’ success at speech comprehension requires more effort compared to younger adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the auditory realm, this is exemplified by the relationship between age-related hearing loss (presbycusis), speech recognition problems, social isolation, depression and cognitive decline (Weinstein and Ventry, 1982; Gordon-Salant et al, 2006; Panza et al, 2015; Wayne and Johnsrude, 2015; Deal et al, 2016; Peelle and Wingfield, 2016). Presbycusis affects ~35% of humans older than 65 and ~45% of humans older than 75 years (Gates and Mills, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To subjectively test the preference of users on the quality of the audio output of our system in a multi-speaker scenario, we performed a psychoacoustic experiment (see Methods). Because it is known that listening effort is increased for those with hearing impairments in multi-speaker scenarios [4, 5], we measured the subjective quality of the output of our system by asking listeners to rate (from 1 to 5) the difficulty of attending to the target speaker (Mean Opinion Score, MOS). All but one subject reported a larger MOS when the system was on, with a median MOS of 3.87 (25th percentile, 3.73; 75th percentile, 4.12) versus a median MOS of 3.5 (25th percentile, 2.9; 75th percentile, 3.8) when the system was off (figure 8(B)), which was a significant increase in MOS (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p <0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%