2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12559-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural representation of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces in the distributed system for face perception

Abstract: Personally familiar faces are processed more robustly and efficiently than unfamiliar faces. The human face processing system comprises a core system that analyzes the visual appearance of faces and an extended system for the retrieval of person-knowledge and other nonvisual information. We applied multivariate pattern analysis to fMRI data to investigate aspects of familiarity that are shared by all familiar identities and information that distinguishes specific face identities from each other. Both identity-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

20
90
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
20
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The personal relevance of the faces had a far more substantial impact on ERP and fMRI measures than their emotional content. In accordance with previous research, our unimodal fMRI analyses showed that personal relevance increased activation in the core and extended face processing network (Gobbini & Haxby, 2007;Ramon & Gobbini, 2018;Visconti Di Oleggio Castello et al, 2017), including fusiform gyrus, posterior STS and inferior frontal gyrus [core network], and in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex as parts of the extended face network.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The personal relevance of the faces had a far more substantial impact on ERP and fMRI measures than their emotional content. In accordance with previous research, our unimodal fMRI analyses showed that personal relevance increased activation in the core and extended face processing network (Gobbini & Haxby, 2007;Ramon & Gobbini, 2018;Visconti Di Oleggio Castello et al, 2017), including fusiform gyrus, posterior STS and inferior frontal gyrus [core network], and in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex as parts of the extended face network.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Neuroimaging research suggests that this advantage involves a core face processing network comprised of occipital face area (OFA), fusiform face area (FFA), posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), anterior STS, and inferior frontal gyrus, as well as an extended face processing network, which includes brain regions involved in episodic memories (precuneous, anterior temporal cortex), person knowledge (temporoparietal junction (TPJ), medial prefrontal cortex) and emotion processing (amygdala, insula); (Gobbini & Haxby, 2007;Natu & O'Toole, 2011). The extended network shows stronger activation for familiar compared to unfamiliar faces (Haxby, Hoffman, & Gobbini, 2000;Natu & O'Toole, 2011;Visconti Di Oleggio Castello, Halchenko, Guntupalli, Gors, & Gobbini, 2017), which might be the neural basis for behavioural findings of more robust face detection and recognition for familiar faces (Ramon & Gobbini, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true for the pars opercularis of the IFG (Brodmann area 44), which has been proposed as the human homolog of the monkey ventral premotor area F5 (Petrides, 2005;Petrides & Pandya, 1994). We found activation in response to dynamic facial expressions in this region, which did not overlap with the more anteroventral part of the IFG that is typically activated in emotional expression labeling (e.g., Hariri et al, 2000) or person identification (e.g., Visconti di Oleggio Castello et al, 2017). There is a great deal of evidence that the cerebellum is also involved in motor processing (Manto et al, 2012) and some studies suggested its involvement in mirror neuron functioning (e.g., Leslie et al, 2004; for a review, see Van Overwalle et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…22.4 ± 5.6 years; age of the males: 22.6 ± 3.3 years). A previous methodological study indicated that a total of 45 participants is recommended to achieve a statistical power of 80% with a standard effect size (Cohen's d = 1) using a voxel-wise whole-brain correction (Wager et al, 2009). The participants were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al 1998), a short structured diagnostic interview, by a psychiatrist or psychologist.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, is the familiarity enhancement effect due to tuning of bottom-up perceptual filters, or to top-down feedback 8,9,11 ? Previous studies could not address this question as they used only unfamiliar face images [22][23][24] , indirect analyses of steady-state visual evoked responses 26 or functional magnetic resonance imaging with low temporal resolution [27][28][29][30][31] . Our finding that identity and gender information are significantly enhanced for familiar faces, very early on in processing, and virtually as early as this information becomes available, provides a possible neural mechanism for the strong behavioral enhancement in perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%