2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neuroanatomy of Remote Memory

Abstract: In humans and experimental animals, damage to the hippocampus or related medial temporal lobe structures severely impairs the formation of new memory but typically spares very remote memory. Questions remain about the importance of these structures for the storage and retrieval of remote autobiographical memory. We carried out a detailed volumetric analysis of structural brain images from eight memory-impaired patients. Five of the patients had damage limited mainly to the medial temporal lobe. These patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
128
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
128
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with evidence from patients with retrograde amnesia which suggest that the hippocampus is necessary for retrieving episodic AMs but less important for semantic AMs (although see Bayley, Gold, Hopkins, & Squire, 2005; for reviews see Nadel & Moscovitch, 1997). On the other hand, it might not be the type of memory per se that is critical in the engagement of MTL (Ryan, Cox, Hayes, & Nadel, 2008), but rather the vividness associated with retrieval (although seeBayley, Hopkins, & Squire, 2003;e.g., Steinvorth, Levine, & Corkin, 2005).…”
Section: Relivingsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These results are consistent with evidence from patients with retrograde amnesia which suggest that the hippocampus is necessary for retrieving episodic AMs but less important for semantic AMs (although see Bayley, Gold, Hopkins, & Squire, 2005; for reviews see Nadel & Moscovitch, 1997). On the other hand, it might not be the type of memory per se that is critical in the engagement of MTL (Ryan, Cox, Hayes, & Nadel, 2008), but rather the vividness associated with retrieval (although seeBayley, Hopkins, & Squire, 2003;e.g., Steinvorth, Levine, & Corkin, 2005).…”
Section: Relivingsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Over time, continued reactivation strengthens the connections between cortical regions until memory can eventually be retrieved without the support of the hippocampus (Alvarez and Squire 1994;Squire and Wixted 2011). Consistent with this idea, damage to the neocortex (e.g., lateral temporal, frontal) leads to impairments in remote memory (Mangels et al 1996;Reed and Squire 1998;Murre et al 2001;Bayley et al 2003Bayley et al , 2005Squire and Bayley 2007;Squire and Wixted 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The only volume reduction in these regions Ͼ1.3 SD of the control mean was the parietal lobe for RS (36).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 92%