2020
DOI: 10.1007/7854_2020_127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neurobiology of Impulsive Decision-Making and Reinforcement Learning in Nonhuman Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acetylcholine on a global level in the brain has been found to be relevant in almost every decision-making paradigm. Lesioning studies of the basal forebrain have shown disruptions in reversal learning in marmosets [ 182 ], as well as being implicated in memory storage [ 183 , 184 ]. The role of ACh in memory has been shown to act as a modulator of update speed and as a controller of meta learning [ 185 ].…”
Section: Role Of Acetylcholine In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acetylcholine on a global level in the brain has been found to be relevant in almost every decision-making paradigm. Lesioning studies of the basal forebrain have shown disruptions in reversal learning in marmosets [ 182 ], as well as being implicated in memory storage [ 183 , 184 ]. The role of ACh in memory has been shown to act as a modulator of update speed and as a controller of meta learning [ 185 ].…”
Section: Role Of Acetylcholine In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In proposing this method, we do not wish to discount the large and impressive nonhuman literature on the behavioral neuroscience of impulsive and risky choice (e.g., seeDalley & Robbins, 2017;Fellows, 2004;Groman, 2020;Isles et al, 2019;Madden & Bickel, 2010 for some illustrative reviews and perspectives). Rather, our aim is to facilitate a more effective integration of behavior-analytic method/theory into the behavioral neuroscience of impulsive and risky choice.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2022, 117, 363-383 NUMBER 3 (MAY) © 2022 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, previous work suggests that impulsive decision-making in clinical groups is maladaptive [ 94 , 95 ]. In contrast, our results across the three tasks suggest that impulsive behavior is not inherently negative and can be beneficial when an environment is more volatile than expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%