2000
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This cortical area reorganization related to language (temporal chain pre-existing frontal), consists in the activation of not injured areas in both hemispheres, but particularly the right hemisphere, that may be decisive for the recovery of the language function 11,[22][23][24][25] . In this sample only 15 patients were under speech treatment, different from what happens in the United States, where most of the patients who have language disturbs achieve specific treatment to improve the maximum recovery 26 . In Brazil we still have difficulties in referring how important the speech treatment is for the reduction of recovery time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This cortical area reorganization related to language (temporal chain pre-existing frontal), consists in the activation of not injured areas in both hemispheres, but particularly the right hemisphere, that may be decisive for the recovery of the language function 11,[22][23][24][25] . In this sample only 15 patients were under speech treatment, different from what happens in the United States, where most of the patients who have language disturbs achieve specific treatment to improve the maximum recovery 26 . In Brazil we still have difficulties in referring how important the speech treatment is for the reduction of recovery time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mechanisms of spontaneous recovery are likely to be different from those of training-induced recovery (cf. Johansson, 2000;Thompson, 2000). As regards cortical correlates of aphasia treatment, only a few studies have been published thus far (Musso et al, 1999;Small et al, 1998;Belin et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from patient data also supports this 'map extension' (Thompson, 2000a) with reports of renewed language impairments in people with aphasia with previously recovered language function, but who go on to experience a second left hemisphere stroke (Basso, Gardelli, Grassi, & Mariotti, 1989). Neuroimaging studies have also demonstrated activation of perilesional tissue adjacent to the lesioned area in response to language processing (Heiss, Kessler, Thiel, Ghaemi, & Karbe, 1999;Kurland et al, 2004;Warburton, Price, Swinburn, & Wise, 1999).…”
Section: Stages Of Recoverysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It should be noted that these mechanisms have not been examined as predictors of chronic recovery, but instead have explained changes or between subject differences in behaviour at the acute stage. (Lazar & Antoniello, 2008;Thompson, 2000a). These two mechanisms have been at the centre of the debate on language recovery for the past 100 years and the emergence of new noninvasive neuroimaging techniques has prompted a renewed interest in determining whether recruitment of residual left hemisphere language regions or contralateral homologues mediates recovery (Muñoz-Cespedes et al, 2005).…”
Section: Stages Of Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%