1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8032-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neurobiology of Motivation and Reward

Abstract: PrefaceThis book was conceived many years ago as an abstract goal for a father-son team when the father was working in university administration and the son was just getting into the academic business. Eventually, the father returned to the laboratory, the son began to get his feet on the ground, and the goal became concrete. Now the work is finished, and our book enters the literature as, we hope, a valuable contribution to understanding the terribly complex and subtle problem of the neurobiology of motivated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some blocks of trials resulted in larger total earnings for the subjects (e.g., 0.9 reward probability and 0.9 reward magnitude to the T 1 compared with 0.9 reward probability and 0.1 reward magnitude to T 1 ). A higher amount of money per trial could result in a higher motivation level and conceivably lead to an increase in overall saccadic preparation (Stellar and Stellar, 1985). Unlike the other top-down factors described above, motivation was associated with a block of trials and not spatially associated with each target.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some blocks of trials resulted in larger total earnings for the subjects (e.g., 0.9 reward probability and 0.9 reward magnitude to the T 1 compared with 0.9 reward probability and 0.1 reward magnitude to T 1 ). A higher amount of money per trial could result in a higher motivation level and conceivably lead to an increase in overall saccadic preparation (Stellar and Stellar, 1985). Unlike the other top-down factors described above, motivation was associated with a block of trials and not spatially associated with each target.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Monkeys perform with greater speed and accuracy when a more valued reward is expected (Hassani et al 2001;Hollerman et al 1998;Kawagoe et al 1998Kawagoe et al , 2004Kobayashi et al 2002;Lauwereyns et al 2002a,b;Leon and Shadlen 1999;Musallam et al 2004;Roesch andOlson 2003, 2004;Takikawa et al 2002;Tremblay et al 1998;Watanabe 1990;Watanabe et al 2001) just as rats run faster for a higher concentration of sucrose (Stellar 1982). This indicates that neural processes underlying response preparation and execution are enhanced when motivation is high (Stellar and Stellar 1985). In the present experiment, speed and accuracy measures were not appropriate indicators of motivational level because they were influenced by elapsed delay as distinct from anticipated delay.…”
Section: Neuronal Activity Dependent On Anticipated Delay: Does It Rementioning
confidence: 98%
“…SSRIs do suppress food intake [153,154] and fluid consumption [152] and decrease palatability [155]. Yet, motivational factors exert some control on the expression of these behaviors [156]. For instance, SSRIs enhance satiety [150] but selectively reduce preference for certain macronutrients (i.e., sweet items and carbohydrates) [157][158][159] cf.…”
Section: Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%