2008
DOI: 10.1002/ddrr.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neurocognitive phenotype in velo‐cardio‐facial syndrome: A developmental perspective

Abstract: Although research has focused primarily on the wide range of variability in the cognitive phenotype between individuals with velo-cardio-facial syndrome (VCFS), we know relatively little about the extent to which within-individual expressions of the cognitive phenotype remain stable throughout development. General cognitive functioning in the low borderline range is the most consistent cognitive finding. Stronger reading decoding and spelling skills as well as auditory/verbal rote memory skills have been repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
78
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
2
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 22q11DS was initially considered a model of nonverbal learning disabilities [Fuerst et al, 1995;Swillen et al, 1999], empirical data have questioned this assumption. In contrast to nonverbal learning disabilities, the differences between verbal and nonverbal IQ in 22q11DS are on average quite small, about 6 IQ points, and profiles of better nonverbal than verbal abilities are not uncommon in patients with 22q11DS [De Smedt et al, 2007a;Simon et al, 2007;Antshel et al, 2008].…”
Section: Q11 Deletion Syndromementioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although 22q11DS was initially considered a model of nonverbal learning disabilities [Fuerst et al, 1995;Swillen et al, 1999], empirical data have questioned this assumption. In contrast to nonverbal learning disabilities, the differences between verbal and nonverbal IQ in 22q11DS are on average quite small, about 6 IQ points, and profiles of better nonverbal than verbal abilities are not uncommon in patients with 22q11DS [De Smedt et al, 2007a;Simon et al, 2007;Antshel et al, 2008].…”
Section: Q11 Deletion Syndromementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, their findings only apply to this subgroup of children with 22q11DS. Examinations of such a more homogenous subgroup of 22q11DS are desirable [see also Antshel et al, 2008;Murphy and Mazzocco, 2008], especially in view of the investigation of academic achievement, as educational factors, like mainstream versus special education, might have a tremendous impact on children's performance on tasks measuring curriculum-related abilities.…”
Section: Mathematical Learning Difficulties In 22q11dsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from the somatic consequences of this deletion, the disorder is characterized by a high incidence of cognitive and psychiatric disabilities (Baker and Vorstman 2012), including notably a mild decrease in IQ (Antshel et al 2008a) and a high prevalence of psychotic symptoms (Baker and Skuse 2005) and schizophrenia (Murphy et al 1999). In this disorder, structural alterations of the brain networks are sustained by white matter alterations including a well described 11-16 % loss of volume (Simon et al 2005;Eliez et al 2000) and widespread microstructural defects (Sundram et al 2010;Barnea-Goraly et al 2003;da Silva et al 2011;Simon et al 2008) that have furthermore been associated to various cognitive deficiencies (Radoeva et al 2012;Barnea-Goraly et al 2005;Simon et al 2008) and psychiatric symptoms (Radoeva et al 2012) including schizotypal traits (Sundram et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22q11.2DS is characterized by specific craniofacial features (cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency, 69-100%), thymic and parathyroid defects (17-60%), mild to moderate renal anomalies (36-37%), congenital cardiovascular malformations (49-83%), and a range of cognitive and behavioral impairments (Grigorenko et al, 2010). Low average to borderline range of general cognitive functioning is one of the most consistent findings in the phenotypic presentation of 22q11.2DS (Antshel et al, 2008). Patients with duplications of the same region at 22q11.2 have been reported (de La Rochebrochard et al, 2006;Alberti et al, 2007;Yu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%