2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neuropathological signature of bulbar-onset ALS: A systematic review

Abstract: ALS is a multisystem disorder affecting cognitive and motor functions. Bulbar-onset ALS (bALS) may be preferentially associated with language/cognitive impairments, compared with spinal-onset ALS (sALS), stemming from a potentially unique neuropathology. The objective of this systematic review was to compare neuropathology reported for bALS and sALS subtypes in studies of cadaveric brains. Using Cochrane guidelines, we reviewed articles in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases using standardized search terms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that both bulbar- and spinal-onset subgroups develop atrophy of similar anatomical regions, which is congruent to neuropathologic studies. 45 However, we found a differential pattern of cerebral involvement in patients with bulbar or spinal onset at baseline and at follow-up: bulbar-onset patients showed prominent gray matter atrophy and some white matter changes at baseline, whereas spinal-onset patients mainly displayed widespread loss of connectivity. At follow-up, gray matter became affected in spinal-onset patients, whereas bulbar-onset patients showed no additional brain changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…We observed that both bulbar- and spinal-onset subgroups develop atrophy of similar anatomical regions, which is congruent to neuropathologic studies. 45 However, we found a differential pattern of cerebral involvement in patients with bulbar or spinal onset at baseline and at follow-up: bulbar-onset patients showed prominent gray matter atrophy and some white matter changes at baseline, whereas spinal-onset patients mainly displayed widespread loss of connectivity. At follow-up, gray matter became affected in spinal-onset patients, whereas bulbar-onset patients showed no additional brain changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In fact, differences in pathology between bulbar-onset and spinal-onset ALS patients have been reported. For example, some bulbar-onset ALS cases presented with atypical pathology such as neuro brillary tangles and basophilic inclusion, which were not found in the spinal-onset ALS cases [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, it is noteworthy that brainstem motoneurons may not share precisely the same pathophysiological characteristics as those of spinal motoneurons (Shellikeri et al . ): indeed, in the same SOD1 G93A mouse model, there is hyperexcitability of trigeminal fast motoneurons, as well as signs of hypoexcitability in slow ones (Venugopal et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%