2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neuropsychology of Feature Binding and Conscious Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tavassoli 9 , et. al., claim that spatial frequency and orientation are important features in visual processing and can guide visual attention.…”
Section: Features Of Target 41 Spatial Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tavassoli 9 , et. al., claim that spatial frequency and orientation are important features in visual processing and can guide visual attention.…”
Section: Features Of Target 41 Spatial Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seeds of the relationship between attentional processes, perception, and consciousness, were shown by Anne Treisman 7 in her 'feature integration theory' (FIT). Though this theory has received various criticisms 8 , it is still a powerful interpretative framework to understand the critical involvement of spatial attention, object spatial coding and feature binding in visual conscious experience 9 . Treismanjustified the relevance of FIT in her later works on illusory conjunctions and the symptoms experienced by patients with simultanagnosia 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of how feature binding is maintained in working memory has received a lot of attention in the psychological and neuroscientific literature (Treisman & Gelade, 1980; Treisman, 1998;Schneegans & Bays, 2019a; Treccani, 2018). These studies focused on investigating two questions: 1) whether objects are stored in the visual working memory as bound objects or separated features, and 2) whether the maintenance of binding in working memory requires the involvement of additional processing resource, for instance, attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to interact with the world efficiently, we need to not only correctly integrate different features into an object when viewing them, but also need to develop an internal representation of bound objects which remain accessible after the visual stimuli disappeared. How conjunctions of features are maintained has received a lot of attention in both the psychological and neuroscientific fields (Treisman & Gelade, 1980;Treisman, 1998;Schneegans & Bays, 2019a;Treccani, 2018). These studies largely focused on investigating on whether objects are stored in visual working memory (VWM) as bound objects or separated features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How this form of generalization works is not entirely understood ( 10 ) but seems to require some form of feature binding ( 11 ) to first determine which stimuli belong together as a unified object ( 6 , 12 , 13 ) and then to link the object to some inherent value, or valence ( 14 ). Hence, feature binding appears to be essential for object-based attention ( 15 17 ), as neural gain has to be allocated to specific features first in order to perceive an object as a whole. At the same time, distinct stimulus features can become unbound from an attended object if they are selectively ignored ( 18 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%