Blackwell Handbook of Sensation and Perception 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470753477.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neuropsychology of Visual Object and Space Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this claim is controversial (Jarrold et al, 2007b). WM provides short-term maintenance of immediately pertinent information, and is thought to be subserved by limited capacity storage buffers that are specialized for different types of information (Baddeley, 1993), including distinct visual WM stores for spatial location and object identity (Carlesimo, Perri, Turriziani, Tomaiuolo, & Caltagirone, 2001; Riddoch, Humphreys, Blott, Hardy, & Smith, 2003; Humphreys & Riddoch, 2001; Wilson, Clare, Young, & Hodges, 1997). One possibility is that uneven WM performance reflects uneven perceptual processes rather than working memory per se, which may help account for the inconsistent evidence as perceptual demands differ across the studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this claim is controversial (Jarrold et al, 2007b). WM provides short-term maintenance of immediately pertinent information, and is thought to be subserved by limited capacity storage buffers that are specialized for different types of information (Baddeley, 1993), including distinct visual WM stores for spatial location and object identity (Carlesimo, Perri, Turriziani, Tomaiuolo, & Caltagirone, 2001; Riddoch, Humphreys, Blott, Hardy, & Smith, 2003; Humphreys & Riddoch, 2001; Wilson, Clare, Young, & Hodges, 1997). One possibility is that uneven WM performance reflects uneven perceptual processes rather than working memory per se, which may help account for the inconsistent evidence as perceptual demands differ across the studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, each movement system is assumed to be``space giving'', that is to constitute its specific space. Evidence for the existence of multiple spaces is available from recent neuropsychological studies indicating that space is not coded in a unitary way and that the differentiation between specific spaces is according to action (Berti, Smania, & Allport, 2001;Humphreys & Heinke, 1998;Humphreys & Riddoch, 2001;Humphreys, Riddoch, Forti, & Ackroyd, 2004 this issue; see also Bremmer, Schlack, Duhamel, Graf, &Fink, 2001, andMatelli &Luppino, 2001, for corresponding conclusions from neurophysiological investigations with animals). The integration of the different movement-specific spaces results from the coordination between the respective movement systems.…”
Section: Multiple Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, due to the continuous movements of objects and ourselves, our visual experience is dynamic rather than stationary (Freyd, 1987;Gibson, 1979;Pylyshyn & Storm, 1988). Despite the complexity of visual information, we can still perceive the world vividly (Brady, Konkle, Alvarez, & Oliva, 2008) and recognize visual environments without considerable effort (Humphreys & Riddoch, 2001). How can our visual system process complex information efficiently?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%