2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neuroscience of remote memory

Abstract: Recently, there has been renewed interest in the organization and neurobiology of remote memory, and the pace of work in this area has accelerated. Yet the recent literature does not suggest that a consensus is developing, and there is disagreement about both facts and their interpretation. This article undertakes a comprehensive review of the three kinds of evidence that have been most prominent in recent discussion: studies of retrograde amnesia in memory-impaired patients who have well-characterized lesions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
175
2
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
14
175
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the standard consolidation model (SCM), the hippocampus has a time-limited role in the storage and retrieval of AMs, whereby memories become independent from the hippocampus and dependent upon neocortical areas following consolidation (Alvarez & Squire, 1994). This idea is consistent with evidence from patients with focal lesions in the MTL who demonstrate AM loss that is temporally graded in the favor of remote AMs (for a review see Squire & Bayley, 2007). For example, Bayley, Hopkins and Squire (2003) asked patients with MTL damage and healthy controls to recall remote AMs (i.e., decades old) and coded these memories with respect to the number of details.…”
Section: Remote Autobiographical Memoriessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…According to the standard consolidation model (SCM), the hippocampus has a time-limited role in the storage and retrieval of AMs, whereby memories become independent from the hippocampus and dependent upon neocortical areas following consolidation (Alvarez & Squire, 1994). This idea is consistent with evidence from patients with focal lesions in the MTL who demonstrate AM loss that is temporally graded in the favor of remote AMs (for a review see Squire & Bayley, 2007). For example, Bayley, Hopkins and Squire (2003) asked patients with MTL damage and healthy controls to recall remote AMs (i.e., decades old) and coded these memories with respect to the number of details.…”
Section: Remote Autobiographical Memoriessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…17 In humans, damage to the hippocampus generally impairs memory for material that was learned a few years before the damage occurred. 20,21 The expression patterns of several biochemical markers of neural activity support the importance of the cortical regions in long-term memory storage. 22,23 The expression of activity-related genes, such as c-fos and Zif268, gradually decreased in the hippocampus after learning, whereas there was a parallel increase in gene expression in the cortical regions, such as the prefrontal, frontal, anterior cingulate, retrosplenial, and temporal cortices.…”
Section: Learning and Memorymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recent memories are more likely to be affected, and remote memories are less likely to be affected. [17][18][19][20] In laboratory animals, lesions to the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, or fornix typically impair memory for material learned up to 30 days before the lesion was introduced. 17 In humans, damage to the hippocampus generally impairs memory for material that was learned a few years before the damage occurred.…”
Section: Learning and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory retrieval is assessed by the fear response the animals display when returned to the conditioning chamber. This is a model of explicit memory that is sensitive to hippocampal lesions and, reported by a number of groups, to show the temporal gradient in amnesia seen in many studies of human hippocampal patients with older (consolidated) context memories insensitive to hippocampal lesion (Kim and Fanselow 1992;Anagnostaras et al 1999;Squire and Bayley 2007). In Liu et al (2012), cfos-based genetic tagging was used to introduce channelrhodopsin (ChR2) into dentate gyrus (DG) neurons that were activated during contextual fear learning.…”
Section: Optogenetic Manipulation During Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%