2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-05002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new diagnostic criteria for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia is useful for predicting clinical outcome: comparison of the 4th and 5th World Health Organization classifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition, classification, and diagnostic criteria in many categories of myeloid neoplasms have been updated in WHO-5 and ICC, because of our understanding of morphology and molecular genetic changes. There have been a few comparison studies using the WHO classification, which support the newly updated categorization [62,63]. ICC for acute leukemia has been adopted in the new European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition, classification, and diagnostic criteria in many categories of myeloid neoplasms have been updated in WHO-5 and ICC, because of our understanding of morphology and molecular genetic changes. There have been a few comparison studies using the WHO classification, which support the newly updated categorization [62,63]. ICC for acute leukemia has been adopted in the new European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the findings of Park et al, KRAS mutations confer significantly inferior survival rates compared with mutations in other genes (median OS was 0.4 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.007) [ 79 ]. Moreover, NRAS mutations co-occur with other gene mutations, such as KRAS and CEBPA ( p = 0.012; and p = 0.049, respectively) [ 79 ].…”
Section: Molecular Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the findings of Park et al, KRAS mutations confer significantly inferior survival rates compared with mutations in other genes (median OS was 0.4 vs. 6.5 months, p = 0.007) [ 79 ]. Moreover, NRAS mutations co-occur with other gene mutations, such as KRAS and CEBPA ( p = 0.012; and p = 0.049, respectively) [ 79 ]. The study performed by Badar et al indicated that the acquisition of detectable levels of RAS and/or FLT3 -ITD gene mutation at the moment of MDS transformation to AML resulted in approximately 30% of cases and predicted extremely poor outcomes [ 24 ].…”
Section: Molecular Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation