2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1766663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new frontier in stamping simulation — ensuring production robustness under the “reality” of process and raw material scatter

Abstract: FE Robustness: comparing sheet metal forming variation and finite element models AIP Conf.Abstract. Stamping processes are routinely validated and optimized using simulation tools. Process optimization, carried out manually or automatically, establishes a single set of conditions capable of producing a good part, without any consideration of the robustness of the stamping process. This paper presents a new approach to virtual validation of stamping processes that simultaneously, and in a natural fashion, also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After performing multiple simulations the output response space is generated, allowing the user to assess the process capability and robustness. Use of this tool is becoming more widespread with a great deal of work being produced [21][22][23][24] with good success. Using AutoForm Sigma, Sigvant [20] and Carleer [21], were able to successfully troubleshoot the cause for splitting during the production of an automotive structural component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After performing multiple simulations the output response space is generated, allowing the user to assess the process capability and robustness. Use of this tool is becoming more widespread with a great deal of work being produced [21][22][23][24] with good success. Using AutoForm Sigma, Sigvant [20] and Carleer [21], were able to successfully troubleshoot the cause for splitting during the production of an automotive structural component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%