2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new heavy mesons: A status report

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
744
4
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 761 publications
(774 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
(198 reference statements)
19
744
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential problem in that value is the insufficient control of theoretical uncertainties in the transition matrix elements to guarantee an accuracy at a percent level, especially when the radial excitations are involved. The corresponding transition matrix elements have been computed by using quark models [3][4][5][6]. 1 Indeed the resulting value m η b = 9390.9±2.1 MeV extracted from the BaBar experiment [1,2] was consistent with the value obtained from the similar measurements made at CLEO [8,9], leading to the following value of the hyperfine splitting [10],…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A potential problem in that value is the insufficient control of theoretical uncertainties in the transition matrix elements to guarantee an accuracy at a percent level, especially when the radial excitations are involved. The corresponding transition matrix elements have been computed by using quark models [3][4][5][6]. 1 Indeed the resulting value m η b = 9390.9±2.1 MeV extracted from the BaBar experiment [1,2] was consistent with the value obtained from the similar measurements made at CLEO [8,9], leading to the following value of the hyperfine splitting [10],…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Simulations of QCD with 1 For a complete reviews with extensive lists of references please see ref. [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interested readers may also consult reviews in Refs. [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,39].…”
Section: General Status Of Hadron Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X(3940). The 1 ++ assignment of the X(3940) was disfavored by analyzing the recoil mass distribution of the J/ψ [42]. In Fig.…”
Section: X(3940) and X(4160)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,7] On the other hand, as already mentioned in Ref. [3], we cannot apply the weak-binding relations (1) to the system which has a CDD (Castillejo-Dalitz-Dyson) pole [8] near the threshold. The CDD pole is defined as the pole of the inverse amplitude f −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%