Digital Afterlife 2020
DOI: 10.1201/9780429322198-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘New(ish)’ Property, Informational Bodies, and Postmortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Harbinja (2020), the legislature regarding the deceased's personal data, such as the 2018 UK Data Protection Act, defined personal data as "data relating to a living individual" and denies any rights to access deceased users' personal data after their death. However, the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Article 27, which is a new data privacy law, allows member states to introduce protections for deceased people's data.…”
Section: Legal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Harbinja (2020), the legislature regarding the deceased's personal data, such as the 2018 UK Data Protection Act, defined personal data as "data relating to a living individual" and denies any rights to access deceased users' personal data after their death. However, the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Article 27, which is a new data privacy law, allows member states to introduce protections for deceased people's data.…”
Section: Legal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we regard the deceased users' personal data as an informational body similarly to Floridi (2016), however, Öhman and Floridi (2017) showed the reality of commercial services' use of proxy sites for the deceased. Figure 1 shows the relationship between personal data protection, narrowly defined postmortem privacy, and broadly defined postmortem privacy (Harbinja 2020). Harbinja (2020) argued that legal solutions that promote the protection of privacy recognize the deceased users' wishes as expressed through wills or technology should take precedence over the default application of traditional property and inheritance law.…”
Section: Direction Of Postmortem Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…'Digital immortality' is, however, a contested concept because current thanatechnologies are unable to render convincing humanlike reactions and are vulnerable to deletion, as the demise of some of the aforementioned services suggests. Hence, while some (Harbinja, 2020;Stokes, 2015) regard the networked digital data of the deceased as a form of immortality, others remain sceptical of the notion of immortality through digital means and propose terms such as 'digital endurance' (Bassett, 2018;Kasket, 2019). Nonetheless, Meese et al (2015) argue that adaptive digital presence may offer the deceased the means to maintain active agency in everyday life, and envision 'a time where the dead are making direct interventions into our social lives ' (pp.…”
Section: The Intersubjective Construction Of Personhood and The Digital Persona Of The Deadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research on this theme could provide more nuanced perspectives and highlight sources of conflict within a postmortal society of virtualised ancestors, as well as the legal and ethical frameworks for how to treat the VDP and the deceased's data. Current research is already moving in this direction (Harbinja, 2020;Öhman & Floridi, 2017;Savin-Baden et al, 2017) but adopting a future orientation, as well as a more critical stance, might help foresee both gradual and rapid societal changes deriving from the digital reintegration of the dead into the world of the living and avoid risks that accompany such processes.…”
Section: Conclusion: Towards a Postmortal Society Of Virtualised Ancestors?mentioning
confidence: 99%