2018
DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2018.1427016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new mobilities paradigm and critical security studies: exploring common ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial mobility is contemplated on the basis of various research trends and related theoretical concepts [ 26 , 27 ]. In the area of sociology, Urry (2007) gives definitions of types of mobility calling them simply mobilities , and links them to social life in late modernity.…”
Section: Literature Review/theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial mobility is contemplated on the basis of various research trends and related theoretical concepts [ 26 , 27 ]. In the area of sociology, Urry (2007) gives definitions of types of mobility calling them simply mobilities , and links them to social life in late modernity.…”
Section: Literature Review/theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the scope of criminological and security studies, then, there is a growing understanding that the modalities of discipline take various forms across a number of public and private institutions. Leese and Wittendorp (2018) observe a theoretical overlap between a mobilities-centred understanding of discipline and a securitisation conception in the emerging "security-mobilities nexus" of discourse. This includes the power of "knowledge" and surveillance for control, and the liberal governance of conduct necessary for safe circulation (Sheller and Urry 2016).…”
Section: Disciplined Automobilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall, the effect of routine surveillance, these positive "nudges" and the risk of negative punishment for minor deviations to traffic behaviour, all create a climate of near-total control over drivers (O'Malley 2004). This extends beyond the oversight necessary for safe circulationwhich is the main focus of the mobilities-security nexus literature at present (Leese and Wittendorp 2018). It extends to cosmetic damage, how corners are handled on empty roads, whether one installs cameras in one's own car: the minutiae of drivers' lives.…”
Section: Disciplined Automobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This blurs the distinctions between movement and materiality; fixity and fluidity. This blurring is acute in the study of transport infrastructures that include logistical supply chains (Birtchnell & Böhme, 2020; Birtchnell & Urry, 2015), securitization of mobility and global flows of people and things (Beauchamps et al, 2017; Leese & Wittendorp, 2018) and the intersection between migration studies and mobilities (Pooley, 2017; Thimm & Chaudhuri, 2019).…”
Section: The Mobility Of Infrastructural Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%